Progression of joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis: association with HLA-DRB1, rheumatoid factor, and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in relation to different treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVE To determine the association of HLA-DRB1, rheumatoid factor (RF), and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) status with progression of joint damage in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated according to different treatment strategies. METHODS The present study was conducted using data from the BeSt study (Behandelstrategieën voor Reumatoide Artritis [treatment strategies for rheumatoid arthritis]), a randomized trial comparing 4 targeted (toward achievement of a Disease Activity Score [DAS] of < or =2.4) treatment strategies: sequential monotherapy (group 1), step-up combination therapy (group 2), initial combination therapy with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and prednisone (group 3), and initial combination therapy with methotrexate and infliximab (group 4), in 508 patients with early RA. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict progressive disease (increase of Sharp/van der Heijde score over 2 years beyond the smallest detectable change [4.6]) according to the presence or absence of the shared epitope (SE), DERAA, RF, and ACPA, with correction for other baseline characteristics. RESULTS Progressive disease could not be predicted by presence of the SE: the odds ratio in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, was 1.4, 2.6, 1.9, and 3.0. DERAA carriership did not protect against progressive disease (odds ratio 0.4, 1.4, 0.9, and 0.9 in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). RF positivity and ACPA positivity predicted progressive disease in group 1 (odds ratio 4.7 [95% confidence interval 1.5-14.5] for RF and 12.6 [95% confidence interval 3.0-51.9] for ACPA), but not in groups 2-4 (for RF, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.5 [0.5-4.9], 1.0 [0.3-3.3], and 1.4 [0.4-4.8] in group 2, group 3, and group 4, respectively; for ACPA, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 3.4 [0.8-14.2], 1.7 [0.5-5.4], and 1.8 [0.5-6.8] in group 2, group 3, and group 4). CONCLUSION In patients with early RA treated with the goal of tight control of the DAS, no significant association between HLA-DRB1 status and radiographic progression was found. RF and ACPA were predictive of progressive disease only in patients treated with sequential monotherapy. These observations suggest that effective treatment can prevent radiographic progression, even in patients with risk factors for severe damage.

[1]  E. Morand Effects of glucocorticoids on inflammation and arthritis , 2007, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[2]  B. Dijkmans,et al.  Comparison of Treatment Strategies in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  B. Dijkmans,et al.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study): a randomized, controlled trial. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  G. Hallmans,et al.  Radiological outcome in rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by presence of antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide before and at disease onset, and by IgA-RF at disease onset , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  L. Klareskog,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of citrullinated protein/peptide antibodies (anti-CP) during 5 year follow up in early rheumatoid arthritis: anti-CP status predicts worse disease activity and greater radiological progression , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[6]  P. Riel,et al.  Uncoupling of inflammation and destruction in rheumatoid arthritis : Myth or reality? , 2005 .

[7]  B. Dijkmans,et al.  Specific autoantibodies precede the symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis: a study of serial measurements in blood donors. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[8]  T. Saxne,et al.  Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis , 2003, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[9]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Early versus delayed treatment in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of two cohorts who received different treatment strategies. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  M. Dougados,et al.  Prognostic factors for radiographic damage in early rheumatoid arthritis: a multiparameter prospective study. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  S. Cessie,et al.  Evidence for a protective role of the human leukocyte antigen class II region in early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, Rheumatology.

[12]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. , 1990, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  F. Arnett Revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Orthopedic nursing.

[14]  D. Heijde,et al.  EFFECTS OF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE AND SULPHASALAZINE ON PROGRESSION OF JOINT DAMAGE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS , 1989, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Liang,et al.  The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  P. Gregersen,et al.  The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. , 1987, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  J. Hazes,et al.  The diagnostic properties of rheumatoid arthritis antibodies recognizing a cyclic citrullinated peptide. , 2000, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  H. Cox,et al.  Letter: Moorgate tube disaster: disputed alcohol findings. , 1975, Lancet.