Opinion Formation and the Collective Dynamics of Risk Perception

The formation of collective opinion is a complex phenomenon that results from the combined effects of mass media exposure and social influence between individuals. The present work introduces a model of opinion formation specifically designed to address risk judgments, such as attitudes towards climate change, terrorist threats, or children vaccination. The model assumes that people collect risk information from the media environment and exchange them locally with other individuals. Even though individuals are initially exposed to the same sample of information, the model predicts the emergence of opinion polarization and clustering. In particular, numerical simulations highlight two crucial factors that determine the collective outcome: the propensity of individuals to search for independent information, and the strength of social influence. This work provides a quantitative framework to anticipate and manage how the public responds to a given risk, and could help understanding the systemic amplification of fears and worries, or the underestimation of real dangers.

[1]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[2]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Hichang Cho,et al.  A Social Network Contagion Theory of Risk Perception , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  R. Axelrod The Dissemination of Culture , 1997 .

[5]  M. G. Cosenza,et al.  Spontaneous ordering against an external field in non-equilibrium systems , 2008, 0811.2726.

[6]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Influence of media on collective debates , 2013, ArXiv.

[7]  Cécile Appert-Rolland,et al.  Traffic Instabilities in Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowds , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Fang Wu,et al.  Novelty and collective attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[10]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[11]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[12]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[13]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[14]  Yasufumi Shibanai,et al.  Effects of Global Information Feedback on Diversity , 2001 .

[15]  M. G. Cosenza,et al.  Local versus global interactions in nonequilibrium transitions: A model of social dynamics. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[17]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Interpersonal Amplification of Risk? Citizen Discussions and Their Impact on Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of a Biological Research Facility , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[19]  M. G. Cosenza,et al.  Nonequilibrium transition induced by mass media in a model for social influence. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  C. Watkins,et al.  The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  D. Stau,et al.  Election results and the Sznajd model on Barabasi network , 2002 .

[22]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey , 2007, 0707.1762.

[23]  William J. Burns,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications , 1992 .

[24]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[25]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks , 2012 .

[26]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Individualization as Driving Force of Clustering Phenomena in Humans , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[28]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Scaling and universality in proportional elections. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[29]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[30]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[31]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[32]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[33]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[34]  Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Opinion evolution in closed community , 2000, cond-mat/0101130.

[35]  Sean J. Taylor,et al.  Social Influence Bias: A Randomized Experiment , 2013, Science.

[36]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[37]  D. Helbing,et al.  How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[39]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[40]  B. Latané Dynamic Social Impact: The Creation of Culture by Communication. , 1996 .

[41]  Hansjörg Neth,et al.  Social Influence and the Collective Dynamics of Opinion Formation , 2013, PloS one.

[42]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence Within Social Networks , 2007, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[43]  Frank Renkewitz,et al.  The Influence of Narrative v. Statistical Information on Perceiving Vaccination Risks , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[44]  D. Stauffer,et al.  Election results and the Sznajd model on Barabasi network , 2001, cond-mat/0111147.

[45]  S. Asch Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[46]  Damon Centola An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior , 2011, Science.

[47]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[48]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[49]  Susan E. Riechert,et al.  How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  D. Myers,et al.  Discussion Effects on Racial Attitudes , 1970, Science.

[51]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .