An efficient approach to standardizing the processing of hemispherical images for the estimation of forest structural attributes

Abstract Digital hemispherical photography (DHP) has become a widely used tool for the estimation of forest structural attributes, such as gap fraction, Leaf Area Index (LAI), effective Plant Area Index (PAI e ), and clumping. This development was boosted not only by a rapid technical advance in the field of digital photography but also by the inherent advantages of DHP for in situ measurements of forest structural attributes. However the major drawback of using DHP for the estimation of forest structural attributes is the lack of standardization which impedes a consistent compatibility with other indirect methods. This lack of standardization is mainly due to uncertainties introduced at the stage of image acquisition and processing. Of these, the determination of optimum exposure and thresholding in the image processing chain are two major influences. In this work influences on the estimation of forest structural attributes, namely the radiometric image resolution, the file format and the image band selection, were studied, in particular with regard to the inter-dependence with exposure and the threshold algorithm applied. For this purpose four different automatic threshold algorithms (Ridler, Otsu, Minimum, Isodata) were tested. Results show that the file format and the image band selection influence the estimation of gap fraction, PAI e and clumping indices. The magnitude of this effect however varies with the threshold algorithm applied, i.e. with a strong effect for the Minimum and Isodata algorithms and little effect for the Ridler and Otsu algorithms. The radiometric image resolution was found to cause only a marginal effect. Based on a comparison with LAI-2000 measurements it could also be demonstrated that the file format and the image band selection affect the determination of the optimum exposure. To resolve these issues an efficient approach to standardizing the processing of hemispherical images is proposed. This approach constitutes the stacking of five differently exposed hemispherical images and passing them to an automated clustering algorithm (Isodata) with the subsequent generation of gap fraction images. The resulting PAI e estimation performs better than or comparably to the estimation based on optimally exposed single images. In addition to being robust and objective, our approach provides consistent compatibility with the LAI-2000.

[1]  Guang Zheng,et al.  Retrieving Leaf Area Index (LAI) Using Remote Sensing: Theories, Methods and Sensors , 2009, Sensors.

[2]  Jb Miller,et al.  A formula for average foliage density , 1967 .

[3]  A. Lang.  Estimation of leaf area index from transmission of direct sunlight in discontinuous canopies , 1986 .

[4]  Lee Chapman,et al.  Potential applications of near infra-red hemispherical imagery in forest environments , 2007 .

[5]  G. Russell,et al.  Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography , 1999 .

[6]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Indirect estimates of canopy gap fraction based on the linear conversion of hemispherical photographs Methodology and comparison with standard thresholding techniques , 2007 .

[7]  Geoffrey H. Ball,et al.  ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION , 1965 .

[8]  Bruce Warren.  Digital Photography , 2012 .

[9]  J. Chen,et al.  Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand , 1991 .

[10]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[11]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[12]  F. Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination: Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling , 2004 .

[13]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Leaf area index of boreal forests: theory, techniques, and measurements , 1997 .

[14]  Alemu Gonsamo,et al.  Sampling gap fraction and size for estimating leaf area and clumping indices from hemispherical photographs , 2010 .

[15]  M L Mendelsohn,et al.  THE ANALYSIS OF CELL IMAGES * , 1966, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the effect of canopy architecture on optical measurements of leaf area index using two gap size analysis methods , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Assessment of automatic gap fraction estimation of forests from digital hemispherical photography , 2005 .

[18]  Joshua Andrew Clark.  Forest biomass estimation with hemispherical photography for multiple forest types and various atmospheric conditions , 2010 .

[19]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index , 2011 .

[20]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest using digital photography , 2007 .

[21]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests , 2005 .

[22]  R. Hall,et al.  A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission , 2001 .

[23]  D. Clark,et al.  Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. , 2000 .

[24]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[25]  T. W. Ridler,et al.  Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. , 1978 .

[26]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Effects of image quality, size and camera type on forest light environment estimates using digital hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[27]  Andres Kuusk,et al.  Canopy gap fraction estimation from digital hemispherical images using sky radiance models and a linear conversion method , 2010 .

[28]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Characterizing canopy nonrandomness with a multiband vegetation imager (MVI) , 1997 .

[29]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[30]  Jing M. Chen,et al.  Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation , 2005 .

[31]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[32]  Kaiguang Zhao,et al.  Lidar-based mapping of leaf area index and its use for validating GLOBCARBON satellite LAI product in a temperate forest of the southern USA , 2009 .

[33]  Michael Nobis,et al.  Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection , 2005 .

[34]  Patrick Schleppi,et al.  Estimating leaf area index in different types of mature forest stands in Switzerland: a comparison of methods , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[35]  Craig Macfarlane,et al.  Photographic exposure affects indirect estimation of leaf area in plantations of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. , 2000 .

[36]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Image fusion techniques for remote sensing applications , 2002, Inf. Fusion.

[37]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .