Discovering the Latent Similarities of the KNN Graph by Metric Transformation

The manifold of the dataset turns out to be quite useful in refining the retrieval results, and the diffusion process provides an efficient solution by careful selection of the similarity neighborhood which is usually modeled as the K-nearest neighborhood (KNN) graph. However, existing works are sensitive to the topology noises induced by the first K neighbors. In this paper, we tackle the problem by studying metric transformation which aims at finding new functional relationship to dig the latent similarity. The advantage of the approach lies in its robustness towards the varying K values; that is to say, it could preserve high similarity performances even if K is very large. Except for discussing only the global KNN (i.e. the same K for all neighborhoods) graph, we also investigate to specify a different K for each neighborhood by incorporating the new penalized consensus information (PCI). We show that PCI works superior compared with the original consensus information for denoising. Experiments on multiple affinity matrices have corroborated the superiority of our method with surprising good results.

[1]  B. Nadler,et al.  Diffusion maps, spectral clustering and reaction coordinates of dynamical systems , 2005, math/0503445.

[2]  Stephen Lin,et al.  Graph Embedding and Extensions: A General Framework for Dimensionality Reduction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Shape google: Geometric words and expressions for invariant shape retrieval , 2011, TOGS.

[4]  Bo Wang,et al.  Unsupervised metric learning by Self-Smoothing Operator , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[5]  Bruno Lévy,et al.  Laplace-Beltrami Eigenfunctions Towards an Algorithm That "Understands" Geometry , 2006, IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications 2006 (SMI'06).

[6]  Bo Wang,et al.  Affinity learning via self-diffusion for image segmentation and clustering , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Qi Tian,et al.  Packing and Padding: Coupled Multi-index for Accurate Image Retrieval , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Edwin R. Hancock,et al.  Clustering and Embedding Using Commute Times , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Stéphane Lafon,et al.  Diffusion maps , 2006 .

[10]  Ramakrishna Kakarala,et al.  Consensus of k-NNs for Robust Neighborhood Selection on Graph-Based Manifolds , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Longin Jan Latecki,et al.  Affinity Learning with Diffusion on Tensor Product Graph , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  Horst Bischof,et al.  Diffusion Processes for Retrieval Revisited , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Longin Jan Latecki,et al.  Locally constrained diffusion process on locally densified distance spaces with applications to shape retrieval , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[15]  Thomas A. Funkhouser,et al.  The Princeton Shape Benchmark , 2004, Proceedings Shape Modeling Applications, 2004..

[16]  Yujie Liu,et al.  Modal function transformation for isometric 3D shape representation , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[17]  Paul Suetens,et al.  A comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval , 2013, Pattern Recognit..