sgsR: a structurally guided sampling toolbox for LiDAR-based forest inventories

Establishing field inventories can be labor intensive, logistically challenging and expensive. Optimizing a sample to derive accurate forest attribute predictions is a key management-level inventory objective. Traditional sampling designs involving pre-defined, interpreted strata could result in poor selection of within-strata sampling intensities, leading to inaccurate estimates of forest structural variables. The use of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data as an applied forest inventory tool continues to improve understanding of the composition and spatial distribution of vegetation structure across forested landscapes. The increased availability of wall-to-wall ALS data is promoting the concept of structurally guided sampling (SGS), where ALS metrics are used as an auxiliary data source driving stratification and sampling within management-level forest inventories. In this manuscript, we present an open-source R package named sgsR that provides a robust toolbox for implementing various SGS approaches. The goal of this package is to provide a toolkit to facilitate better optimized allocation of sample units and sample size, as well as to assess and augment existing plot networks by accounting for current forest structural conditions. Here, we first provide justification for SGS approaches and the creation of the sgsR toolbox. We then briefly describe key functions and workflows the package offers and provide two reproducible examples. Avenues to implement SGS protocols according to auxiliary data needs are presented.

[1]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Comparing airborne and spaceborne photon-counting LiDAR canopy structural estimates across different boreal forest types , 2021 .

[2]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Quantifying the precision of forest stand height and canopy cover estimates derived from air photo interpretation , 2021, Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research.

[3]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  lidR: An R package for analysis of Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) data , 2020 .

[4]  M. Maltamo,et al.  From comprehensive field inventories to remotely sensed wall-to-wall stand attribute data — a brief history of management inventories in the Nordic countries , 2020 .

[5]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Comparing features of single and multi-photon lidar in boreal forests , 2020 .

[6]  A. Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of conditioned Latin hypercube sampling for soil mapping based on a machine learning method , 2020 .

[7]  N. Coops,et al.  Transferability of ALS-Derived Forest Resource Inventory Attributes Between an Eastern and Western Canadian Boreal Forest Mixedwood Site , 2020 .

[8]  E. O. Figueiredo,et al.  Evaluating tropical forest classification and field sampling stratification from lidar to reduce effort and enable landscape monitoring , 2020, Forest Ecology and Management.

[9]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Demonstrating the transferability of forest inventory attribute models derived using airborne laser scanning data , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[10]  W. Keeton,et al.  Stand structure drives disparities in carbon storage in northern hardwood-conifer forests , 2019, Forest Ecology and Management.

[11]  Colby Brungard,et al.  Some methods to improve the utility of conditioned Latin hypercube sampling , 2019, PeerJ.

[12]  D. Hayes,et al.  Ecologically-Based Metrics for Assessing Structure in Developing Area-Based, Enhanced Forest Inventories from LiDAR , 2019, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing.

[13]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Forest Variable Estimation Using a High Altitude Single Photon Lidar System , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Douglas K. Bolton,et al.  Predicting temperate forest stand types using only structural profiles from discrete return airborne lidar , 2018 .

[15]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Forest aboveground biomass mapping and estimation across multiple spatial scales using model-based inference , 2016 .

[16]  Mikko T. Niemi,et al.  Extracting Canopy Surface Texture from Airborne Laser Scanning Data for the Supervised and Unsupervised Prediction of Area-Based Forest Characteristics , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[17]  C. Stone,et al.  Optimising nearest neighbour information—a simple, efficient sampling strategy for forestry plot imputation using remotely sensed data , 2016 .

[18]  R. Furrer,et al.  Forest canopy-structure characterization: A data-driven approach , 2015 .

[19]  R. Turner,et al.  Application of LiDAR data to maximise the efficiency of inventory plots in softwood plantations , 2015, New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science.

[20]  Jonathan P. Dash,et al.  Methods for estimating multivariate stand yields and errors using k-NN and aerial laser scanning , 2015 .

[21]  R. Benedetti,et al.  Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys , 2015 .

[22]  Gregory P Asner,et al.  Advances in animal ecology from 3D-LiDAR ecosystem mapping. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Outlook for the Next Generation’s Precision Forestry in Finland , 2014 .

[24]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Efficient sampling strategies for forest inventories by spreading the sample in auxiliary space , 2014 .

[25]  E. Tomppo,et al.  A sampling design for a large area forest inventory: case Tanzania , 2014 .

[26]  Joanne C. White,et al.  A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach , 2013 .

[27]  GrafströmAnton,et al.  Improving forest field inventories by using remote sensing data in novel sampling designs , 2013 .

[28]  A. Finley,et al.  Strategies for minimizing sample size for use in airborne LiDAR-based forest inventory , 2013 .

[29]  E. Næsset,et al.  Post-stratified estimation of forest area and growing stock volume using lidar-based stratifications , 2012 .

[30]  Niklas L. P. Lundström,et al.  Spatially Balanced Sampling through the Pivotal Method , 2012, Biometrics.

[31]  Ronald E. McRoberts,et al.  Estimating forest attribute parameters for small areas using nearest neighbors techniques , 2012 .

[32]  P. Corona Integration of forest mapping and inventory to support forest management , 2010 .

[33]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Comparisons between field- and LiDAR-based measures of stand structural complexity , 2010 .

[34]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Improved estimates of forest vegetation structure and biomass with a LiDAR‐optimized sampling design , 2009 .

[35]  Virpi Junttila,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Estimation of Forest Stand Characteristics from Airborne Laser Scanning , 2008 .

[36]  Michael L. Clutter,et al.  The value of timber inventory information for management planning , 2008 .

[37]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Remote sensing support for national forest inventories , 2007 .

[38]  Richard G. Oderwald,et al.  Forest Volume and Biomass Estimation Using Small-Footprint Lidar-Distributional Parameters on a Per-Segment Basis , 2006 .

[39]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[40]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing stand inventories for large areas based on photo-interpretation and laser scanning by means of cost-plus-loss analyses , 2004 .

[41]  T. Gregoire,et al.  Sampling Strategies for Natural Resources and the Environment , 2004 .

[42]  Timothy E. O'Brien,et al.  A Gentle Introduction to Optimal Design for Regression Models , 2003 .

[43]  D. Leckie Stand delineation and composition estimation using semi-automated individual tree crown analysis , 2003 .

[44]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Uncertainty analysis for pedotransfer functions , 2002 .

[45]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[46]  E. Tomppo,et al.  Selecting estimation parameters for the Finnish multisource National Forest Inventory , 2001 .

[47]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[48]  T. Gregoire Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling: appreciating the difference , 1998 .

[49]  R. Cook Influential Observations in Linear Regression , 1979 .

[50]  J. P. Demaerschalk,et al.  Suggestions and Criteria for More Effective Regression Sampling. 2. , 1974 .

[51]  K. Smith ON THE STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF ADJUSTED AND INTERPOLATED VALUES OF AN OBSERVED POLYNOMIAL FUNCTION AND ITS CONSTANTS AND THE GUIDANCE THEY GIVE TOWARDS A PROPER CHOICE OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVATIONS , 1918 .

[52]  Edzer Pebesma,et al.  Simple Features for R: Standardized Support for Spatial Vector Data , 2018, R J..

[53]  E. Næsset,et al.  Combining UAV and Sentinel-2 auxiliary data for forest growing stock volume estimation through hierarchical model-based inference , 2018 .

[54]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Sampling designs for national forest assessments , 2016 .

[55]  R. Fournier,et al.  Generalizing predictive models of forest inventory attributes using an area-based approach with airborne LiDAR data , 2015 .

[56]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Laser-assisted selection of field plots for an area-based forest inventory , 2013 .

[57]  A. MacKinnon Forest Structure : A Key to the Ecosystem , 2012 .

[58]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Different plot selection strategies for field training data in ALS-assisted forest , 2010 .

[59]  E. Tomppo National Forest Inventories : pathways for common reporting , 2010 .

[60]  William A. Bechtold,et al.  The enhanced forest inventory and analysis program - national sampling design and estimation procedures , 2005 .