Noun incorporation in Frisian (Dyk 1997) is unusual because it shows certain restrictions that are not seen in other languages with noun incorporation, such as Mohawk and Chukchi. In addition, while others argue that noun incorporation is indeed possible in Germanic (see Booij 2009 for Dutch, Barrie and Spreng 2009 for German), Frisian is unusual even with respect to Germanic in allowing noun incorporation in finite clauses. In this paper, I show that noun incorporation in Frisian should be analyzed as synthetic compounding, with the compound licensed by a null verbal head. It is the presence of this head that accounts for the unusual restrictions. Not only does this head explain the distribution of noun incorporation, it also explains the distribution of detransitivization. I show that there are parallels between noun incorporation and synthetic compounding in English with –ing. An important consequence of this analysis is that it allows us to treat this phenomenon in Frisian as a more typologically appropriate instance of compounding rather than as canonical noun incorporation found in polysynthetic languages. This working paper is available in University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics: http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/ vol22/iss1/4 U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 22.1, 2016 Noun Incorporation in Frisian
[1]
G. Booij.
A Constructional Analysis of Quasi-Incorporation in Dutch
,
2009
.
[2]
Paul Martin Postal,et al.
Some syntactic rules in Mohawk
,
1979
.
[3]
M. Baker,et al.
Two Types of Syntactic Noun Incorporation: Noun Incorporation in Mapudungun and its Typological Implications
,
2005
.
[4]
Vladimir P. Nedjalkov,et al.
Antipassive in Chukchee: oblique object, object incorporation, zero object
,
1988
.
[5]
M. Mithun.
The evolution of noun incorporation
,
1984
.
[6]
Hagit Borer,et al.
Structuring Sense: Volume III: Taking Form
,
2013
.
[7]
Michael Barrie,et al.
Noun incorporation and the progressive in German
,
2009
.
[8]
C. Weggelaar,et al.
Noun Incorporation in Dutch
,
1986,
International Journal of American Linguistics.
[9]
A. McIntyre.
Constraining argument structure in nominalizations: The case of English -er
,
2014
.
[10]
Ad Neeleman,et al.
Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation
,
2004
.
[11]
Heidi Harley,et al.
Compounding in Distributed Morphology
,
2011
.
[12]
Rochelle Lieber,et al.
Morphology and Lexical Semantics
,
2004
.
[13]
Mark C. Baker,et al.
Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing
,
1988
.