Considering sink strength to model crop production under elevated atmospheric CO2

Climatic changes and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations will affect crop growth and production in the near future. Rising CO2 concentration is a novel environmental aspect that should be considered when projections for future agricultural productivity are made. In addition to a reducing effect on stomatal conductance and crop transpiration, elevated CO2 concentration can stimulate crop production. The magnitude of this stimulatory effect (‘CO2 fertilization’) is subject of discussion. In this study, different calculation procedures of the generic crop model AquaCrop based on a foregoing theoretical framework and a meta-analysis of field responses, respectively, were evaluated against experimental data of free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) environments. A flexible response of the water productivity parameter of the model to CO2 concentration was introduced as the best option to consider crop sink strength and responsiveness to CO2. By varying the response factor, differences in crop sink capacity and trends in breeding and management, which alter crop responsiveness, can be addressed. Projections of maize (Zea mays L.) and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) production reflecting the differences in responsiveness were simulated for future time horizons when elevated CO2 concentrations and climatic changes are expected. Variation in future yield potential associated with sink strength could be as high as 27% of the total production. Thus, taking into account crop sink strength and variation in responsiveness is equally relevant to considering climatic changes and elevated CO2 concentration when assessing future crop production. Indicative values representing the crop responsiveness to elevated CO2 concentration were proposed for all crops currently available in the database of AquaCrop as a first step in reducing part of the uncertainty involved in modeling future agricultural production.

[1]  G. Fischer,et al.  Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply A comment on: Food for Thought... by Long et al., Science 312: 1918-1921, 2006 , 2007 .

[2]  B. Drake,et al.  MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2? , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[3]  Gang Liu,et al.  Yield formation of CO2-enriched inter-subspecific hybrid rice cultivar Liangyoupeijiu under fully open-air field condition in a warm sub-tropical climate , 2009 .

[4]  R. Naylor,et al.  Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity with Unprecedented Seasonal Heat , 2009, Science.

[5]  C. Tebaldi,et al.  Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Needs for Food Security in 2030 , 2008, Science.

[6]  P. Curtis,et al.  A meta‐analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield , 2002 .

[7]  M. Semenov,et al.  Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. , 2010 .

[8]  Assessing the Consequences of Climate Change for Food and Forest Resources: A View from the IPCC , 2005 .

[9]  C. W. Richardson,et al.  Comparison of the WGEN and LARS-WG stochastic weather generators for diverse climates , 1998 .

[10]  M. Semenov,et al.  USE OF A STOCHASTIC WEATHER GENERATOR IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS , 1997 .

[11]  A. Rogers,et al.  Testing the “source–sink” hypothesis of down-regulation of photosynthesis in elevated [CO2] in the field with single gene substitutions in Glycine max , 2004 .

[12]  S. Long,et al.  FACE-ing the facts: inconsistencies and interdependence among field, chamber and modeling studies of elevated [CO2] impacts on crop yield and food supply. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[13]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop—The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: III. Parameterization and Testing for Maize , 2009 .

[14]  Mikhail A. Semenov,et al.  A serial approach to local stochastic weather models , 1991 .

[15]  F. Tubiello,et al.  Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on crops: approaches and applications for climate change , 2002 .

[16]  S. Long,et al.  What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[17]  A. Leakey.  Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and the future of C4 crops for food and fuel , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  G. Fischer,et al.  Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios , 2004 .

[19]  H. Weigel,et al.  Effect of free air carbon dioxide enrichment combined with two nitrogen levels on growth, yield and yield quality of sugar beet: Evidence for a sink limitation of beet growth under elevated CO2 , 2010 .

[20]  P. V. Vara Prasad,et al.  Temperature variability and the yield of annual crops , 2000 .

[21]  L. Ziska,et al.  Predicting the impact of changing CO(2) on crop yields: some thoughts on food. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[22]  Hendrik Poorter.  Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient CO2 concentration , 2004, Vegetatio.

[23]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES , 1999 .

[24]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop — The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: II. Main Algorithms and Software Description , 2009 .

[25]  Robert J. Nicholls,et al.  Climate and socio-economic scenarios for global-scale climate change impacts assessments: characterising the SRES storylines , 2004 .

[26]  G. Wall,et al.  Development of C4 photosynthesis in sorghum leaves grown under free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE). , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[27]  R. Adams,et al.  Effects of global climate change on agriculture: an interpretative review , 1998 .

[28]  Gang Liu,et al.  Impact of elevated CO2 concentration on inter-subspecific hybrid rice cultivar Liangyoupeijiu under fully open-air field conditions , 2009 .

[29]  K. Loague,et al.  Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application , 1991 .

[30]  E. Fereres,et al.  On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity , 2007, Irrigation Science.

[31]  M. Semenov.  Development of high-resolution UKCIP02-based climate change scenarios in the UK , 2007 .

[32]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[33]  Mark Stitt,et al.  The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: the physiological and molecular background , 1999 .

[34]  J. Dutoit.  The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2007 .

[35]  Bryant,et al.  Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 under low-nitrogen nutrition is affected by the capacity for assimilate utilization. Perennial ryegrass under free-Air CO2 enrichment , 1998, Plant physiology.

[36]  James W. Jones,et al.  POTENTIAL USES AND LIMITATIONS OF CROP MODELS , 1996 .

[37]  D. Raes,et al.  AquaCrop-The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles , 2009 .

[38]  J. Morison,et al.  Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth , 1999 .

[39]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  THE META‐ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY , 1999 .

[40]  D. Raes,et al.  Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop , 2009 .

[41]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology , 1998, Oecologia.

[42]  H. Cutforth,et al.  Crop growth models for decision support systems , 1996 .

[43]  D. Benbi,et al.  Handbook of processes and modeling in the soil-plant system. , 2003 .

[44]  C. Stöckle,et al.  Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. , 2009 .

[45]  G. Bowes.  Facing the Inevitable: Plants and Increasing Atmospheric CO2 , 1993 .

[46]  Michael R. Gillings,et al.  Sink strength may be the key to growth and nitrogen responses in N-deficient wheat at elevated CO2 , 1996 .

[47]  S. Wand,et al.  Responses of wild C4 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: a meta‐analytic test of current theories and perceptions , 1999 .

[48]  H. Farahani,et al.  Parameterization and Evaluation of the AquaCrop Model for Full and Deficit Irrigated Cotton , 2009 .

[49]  Dean C. Adams,et al.  RESAMPLING TESTS FOR META‐ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL DATA , 1997 .

[50]  M. Lieffering,et al.  Changes in sourcesink relations during development influence photosynthetic acclimation of rice to free air CO2 enrichment (FACE). , 2002, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[51]  A. Schapendonk,et al.  Effects of elevated CO2 concentration on photosynthetic acclimation and productivity of two potato cultivars grown in open-top chambers , 2000 .

[52]  S. Long,et al.  Food for Thought: Lower-Than-Expected Crop Yield Stimulation with Rising CO2 Concentrations , 2006, Science.

[53]  J. Porter,et al.  Crop responses to climatic variation , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  M. Bindi,et al.  [Responses of agricultural crops of free-air CO2 enrichment]. , 2002, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[55]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[56]  H. Weigel,et al.  Canopy CO2 exchange of sugar beet under different CO2 concentrations and nitrogen supply: results from a free-air CO2 enrichment study. , 2009, Plant biology.

[57]  A. Rogers,et al.  The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[58]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[59]  A. Rogers,et al.  Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[60]  D. Ort,et al.  FACE-ing the global change: Opportunities for improvement in photosynthetic radiation use efficiency and crop yield , 2009 .

[61]  H. Rogers,et al.  Crop responses to CO2 enrichment , 1993 .