Enhanced Empirical Data for the Fundamental Diagram and the Flow Through Bottlenecks

In recent years, several approaches for modeling pedestrian dynamics have been proposed and applied e.g. for design of egress routes. However, so far not much attention has been paid to their quantitative validation. This unsatisfactory situation belongs amongst others on the uncertain and contradictory experimental data base. The fundamental diagram, i.e. the density-dependence of the flow or velocity, is probably the most important relation as it connects the basic parameter to describe the dynamic of crowds. But specifications in different handbooks as well as experimental measurements differ considerably. The same is true for the bottleneck flow. After a comprehensive review of the experimental data base we give an survey of a research project, including experiments with up to 250 persons performed under well controlled laboratory conditions. The trajectories of each person are measured in high precision to analyze the fundamental diagram and the flow through bottlenecks. The trajectories allow to study how the way of measurement influences the resulting relations. Surprisingly we found large deviation amongst the methods. These may be responsible for the deviation in the literature mentioned above. The results are of particular importance for the comparison of experimental data gained in different contexts and for the validation of models.

[1]  V. Popkov,et al.  Steady-state selection in driven diffusive systems with open boundaries , 1999, cond-mat/0002242.

[2]  M. Schreckenberg,et al.  Experimental study of pedestrian flow through a bottleneck , 2006, physics/0610077.

[3]  R. J. Wheeler,et al.  PEDESTRIAN FLOW CHARACTERISTICS , 1969 .

[4]  Bernhard Steffen,et al.  New Insights into Pedestrian Flow Through Bottlenecks , 2009, Transp. Sci..

[5]  Gary F. Bennett,et al.  The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering : By P.J. DiNenno, C.L. Beyler, R.L.P. Custer, W.D. Walton and J.M. Watts, Jr., National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA and Society of Fire Prot , 1990 .

[6]  B. Kerner THE PHYSICS OF TRAFFIC , 1999 .

[7]  Hiroshi Tsukaguchi,et al.  A new method for evaluation of level of service in pedestrian facilities , 1987 .

[8]  Boris Pushkarev,et al.  CAPACITY OF WALKWAYS , 1975 .

[9]  Takashi Nagatani,et al.  Evacuation of crawlers and walkers from corridor through an exit , 2006 .

[10]  Claire Marrison,et al.  Effects of Motivation and Cabin Configuration on Emergency Aircraft Evacuation Behavior and Rates of Egress , 1996 .

[11]  John J. Fruin,et al.  Pedestrian planning and design , 1971 .

[12]  Michael Schreckenberg,et al.  Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics , 2002 .

[13]  D. Wolf,et al.  Traffic and Granular Flow , 1996 .

[14]  Hubert Klüpfel,et al.  Evacuation Dynamics: Empirical Results, Modeling and Applications , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[15]  Andreas Schadschneider,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Pedestrian Trajectories from Video Recordings , 2010 .

[16]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  B. D. Hankin,et al.  Passenger Flow in Subways , 1958 .

[18]  Armin Seyfried,et al.  Empirical data for pedestrian flow through bottlenecks , 2009 .

[19]  Ulrich Weidmann,et al.  Transporttechnik der Fussgänger , 1992 .

[20]  Wilhelm Leutzbach,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Traffic Flow , 1987 .

[21]  A. Seyfried,et al.  The fundamental diagram of pedestrian movement revisited , 2005, physics/0506170.