Social and Spatial Clustering of People at Humanity’s Largest Gathering

Macroscopic behavior of scientific and societal systems results from the aggregation of microscopic behaviors of their constituent elements, but connecting the macroscopic with the microscopic in human behavior has traditionally been difficult. Manifestations of homophily, the notion that individuals tend to interact with others who resemble them, have been observed in many small and intermediate size settings. However, whether this behavior translates to truly macroscopic levels, and what its consequences may be, remains unknown. Here, we use call detail records (CDRs) to examine the population dynamics and manifestations of social and spatial homophily at a macroscopic level among the residents of 23 states of India at the Kumbh Mela, a 3-month-long Hindu festival. We estimate that the festival was attended by 61 million people, making it the largest gathering in the history of humanity. While we find strong overall evidence for both types of homophily for residents of different states, participants from low-representation states show considerably stronger propensity for both social and spatial homophily than those from high-representation states. These manifestations of homophily are amplified on crowded days, such as the peak day of the festival, which we estimate was attended by 25 million people. Our findings confirm that homophily, which here likely arises from social influence, permeates all scales of human behavior.

[1]  M. Jackson,et al.  An Economic Model of Friendship: Homophily, Minorities and Segregation , 2007 .

[2]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[3]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[4]  Аna Bilinovic,et al.  Homophily in social networks , 2016 .

[5]  G. L. Bon,et al.  Scientific Literature: The Crowd. A Study of the Popular Mind , 1897 .

[6]  Erez Hatna,et al.  Combining Segregation and Integration: Schelling Model Dynamics for Heterogeneous Population , 2015, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[7]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Understanding individual human mobility patterns , 2008, Nature.

[8]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[9]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Analysis of a large-scale weighted network of one-to-one human communication , 2007, physics/0702158.

[10]  P Gregg Greenough,et al.  The Kumbh Mela stampede: disaster preparedness must bridge jurisdictions , 2013, BMJ.

[11]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[12]  G. Simmel The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[13]  J. Coleman Relational Analysis: The Study of Social Organizations with Survey Methods , 1958 .

[14]  Vincent D. Blondel,et al.  A survey of results on mobile phone datasets analysis , 2015, EPJ Data Science.

[15]  Frederick M. Burkle,et al.  Human Stampedes: A Systematic Review of Historical and Peer-Reviewed Sources , 2009, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

[16]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  The effects of classroom racial composition on students' interracial friendliness. , 1985 .

[18]  G. Simmel The Metropolis and Mental Life , 2012 .

[19]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Stochastic blockmodels: First steps , 1983 .

[20]  Kama Maclean,et al.  Pilgrimage and Power: The Kumbh Mela in Allahabad, 1765-1954 , 2008 .

[21]  Marijtje A. J. Van Duijn,et al.  Ethnic segregation in context: Social discrimination among native Dutch pupils and their ethnic minority classmates , 2009, Soc. Networks.

[22]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Community structure and ethnic preferences in school friendship networks , 2006, physics/0611268.

[23]  Roger Smith The Crowd and the Public. , 1993 .

[24]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[25]  M. Morris,et al.  Do People Mix at Mixers? Structure, Homophily, and the “Life of the Party” , 2007 .

[26]  David L. Smith,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Human Mobility on Malaria , 2012, Science.

[27]  I. Couzin,et al.  Shared decision-making drives collective movement in wild baboons , 2015, Science.

[28]  Gabriel Altmann,et al.  The first steps , 2000, Issues in Quantitative Linguistics 4.