An ab initio study of the fcc and hcp structures of helium.

The hexagonal close packed (hcp) and face centered cubic (fcc) structures of helium are studied by using a new ab initio computational model for large complexes comprising small subsystems. The new model is formulated within the framework of the energy incremental scheme. In the calculation of intra- and intersystem energies, model systems are introduced. To each subsystem associated is a set of partner subsystems defined by a vicinity criterion. In the independent calculations of intra- and intersystem energies, the calculations are performed on model subsystems defined by the subsystems considered and their partner subsystems. A small and a large basis set are associated with each subsystem. For partner subsystems in a model system, the small basis set is adopted. By introducing a particular decomposition scheme, the intermolecular potential is written as a sum of effective one-body potentials. The binding energy per atom in an infinite crystal of atoms is the negative value of this one-body potential. The one-body potentials for hcp and fcc structures are calculated for the following nearest neighbor distances (d0): 4.6, 5.1, 5.4, 5.435, 5.5, 5.61, and 6.1 a.u. The equilibrium distance is 5.44 a.u. for both structures. The equilibrium dimer distance is 5.61 a.u. For the larger distances, i.e., d0 > 5.4 a.u., the difference of the effective one-body potentials for the two structures is less than 0.2 microE(h). However, the hcp structure has the lowest effective one-body potential for all the distances considered. For the smallest distance the difference in the effective one-body potential is 3.9 microE(h). Hence, for solid helium, i.e., helium under high pressure, the hcp structure is the preferred one. The error in the calculated effective one-body potential for the distance d0 = 5.61 a.u. is of the order of 1 microE(h) (approximately 0.5%).

[1]  I. Røeggen,et al.  Interatomic potential for the X1Σ +g state of Be2, revisited , 2005 .

[2]  B. Paulus Wave-function-based ab initio correlation treatment for the buckminsterfullerene C60 , 2004 .

[3]  James B. Anderson,et al.  Comment on "An exact quantum Monte Carlo calculation of the helium-helium intermolecular potential" [J. Chem. Phys. 115, 4546 (2001)]. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[4]  Peter Pulay,et al.  Second-order Møller–Plesset calculations with dual basis sets , 2003 .

[5]  Thomas Bondo Pedersen,et al.  Reduced scaling in electronic structure calculations using Cholesky decompositions , 2003 .

[6]  G. Chałasiński,et al.  State of the Art and Challenges of the ab Initio Theory of Intermolecular Interactions. , 2000, Chemical reviews.

[7]  Beate Paulus,et al.  Ab initio calculation of ground-state properties of rare-gas crystals. , 1999 .

[8]  K. Doll,et al.  Closed-shell interaction in silver and gold chlorides , 1998, cond-mat/9806187.

[9]  M. Dolg,et al.  An incremental approach for correlation contributions to the structural and cohesive properties of polymers. Coupled-cluster study of trans-polyacetylene , 1997 .

[10]  I. Røeggen,et al.  A minimal distortion localization of occupied orbitals in supermolecule calculations of intermolecular interactions , 1997 .

[11]  P. Wind,et al.  Electron correlation, extended geminal models, and intermolecular interactions: Theory , 1996 .

[12]  Paulus,et al.  Cohesive energies of cubic III-V semiconductors. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[13]  Doll,et al.  Correlation effects in ionic crystals: The cohesive energy of MgO. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[14]  H. Stoll On the correlation energy of graphite , 1992 .

[15]  Stoll,et al.  Correlation energy of diamond. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[16]  Hermann Stoll,et al.  The correlation energy of crystalline silicon , 1992 .

[17]  J. Almlöf,et al.  Dual basis sets in calculations of electron correlation , 1991 .

[18]  L. Piela,et al.  Proper correction for the basis set superposition error in SCF calculations of intermolecular interactions , 1987 .

[19]  I. Røeggen,et al.  On the Beebe-Linderberg two-electron integral approximation , 1986 .

[20]  I. R. eggen Intermolecular potentials calculated by an extended geminal model: Theory , 1986 .

[21]  P. Certain,et al.  Bounds to two- and three-body long-range interaction coefficients for S-state atoms , 1985 .

[22]  H. F. King,et al.  Rydberg levels of the sodium atom and the ammonium radical calculated by perturbation theory , 1984 .

[23]  I. R. eggen Derivation of an extended geminal model , 1983 .

[24]  H. F. King,et al.  Rydberg radicals. 1. Frozen-core model for Rydberg levels of the ammonium radical , 1983 .

[25]  H. Monkhorst,et al.  On application of 0s orbitals in SCF calculations , 1981 .

[26]  N. H. Beebe,et al.  Simplifications in the generation and transformation of two‐electron integrals in molecular calculations , 1977 .

[27]  S. F. Boys,et al.  The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedures with reduced errors , 1970 .

[28]  Edward Teller,et al.  Interaction of the van der Waals Type Between Three Atoms , 1943 .