A Nonlinear Biomechanical Model Based Registration Method for Aligning Prone and Supine MR Breast Images

Preoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance (MR) breast images can provide good contrast between different tissues and 3-D information about suspicious tissues. Aligning preoperative diagnostic MR images with a patient in the theatre during breast conserving surgery could assist surgeons in achieving the complete excision of cancer with sufficient margins. Typically, preoperative diagnostic MR breast images of a patient are obtained in the prone position, while surgery is performed in the supine position. The significant shape change of breasts between these two positions due to gravity loading, external forces and related constraints makes the alignment task extremely difficult. Our previous studies have shown that either nonrigid intensity-based image registration or biomechanical modelling alone are limited in their ability to capture such a large deformation. To tackle this problem, we proposed in this paper a nonlinear biomechanical model-based image registration method with a simultaneous optimization procedure for both the material parameters of breast tissues and the direction of the gravitational force. First, finite element (FE) based biomechanical modelling is used to estimate a physically plausible deformation of the pectoral muscle and the major deformation of breast tissues due to gravity loading. Then, nonrigid intensity-based image registration is employed to recover the remaining deformation that FE analyses do not capture due to the simplifications and approximations of biomechanical models and the uncertainties of external forces and constraints. We assess the registration performance of the proposed method using the target registration error of skin fiducial markers and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of fibroglandular tissues. The registration results on prone and supine MR image pairs are compared with those from two alternative nonrigid registration methods for five breasts. Overall, the proposed algorithm achieved the best registration performance on fiducial markers (target registration error, 8.44 ±5.5 mm for 45 fiducial markers) and higher overlap rates on segmentation propagation of fibroglandular tissues (DSC value > 82%).

[1]  Kenneth G A Gilhuijs,et al.  Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: An Adequate Localization Method without Seed Migration , 2011, The breast journal.

[2]  Lianghao Han,et al.  Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  D. Hill,et al.  Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  X-ray Mammography - MRI Registration Using a Volume-Preserving Affine Transformation and an EM-MRF for Breast Tissue Classification , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[5]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[6]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  M. A. Lago,et al.  Breast prone-to-supine deformation and registration using a Time-of-Flight camera , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[8]  Donald B. Plewes,et al.  Supine breast MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  B. Goh,et al.  Eighteen‐year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy , 2004, Cancer.

[10]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Methods for Modeling and Predicting Mechanical Deformations of the Breast Under External Perturbations , 2001, MICCAI.

[11]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  MR Navigated Breast Surgery: Method and Initial Clinical Experience , 2008, MICCAI.

[12]  Vijayaraghavan Rajagopal,et al.  Modelling Breast Tissue Mechanics Under Gravity Loading , 2007 .

[13]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Peter Hastreiter,et al.  Strategies for brain shift evaluation , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Fast Deformation Simulation of Breasts Using GPU-Based Dynamic Explicit Finite Element Method , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[16]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  A hybrid fem-based method for aligning prone and supine images for image guided breast surgery , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[17]  H. Feigelson,et al.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. , 2012, JAMA.

[18]  T. Peters,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image-guided neurosurgery. , 2000, Medical physics.

[19]  Robert Trampel,et al.  Navigation concepts for MR image‐guided interventions , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Martyn P. Nash,et al.  Modelling Prone to Supine Breast Deformation Under Gravity Loading Using Heterogeneous Finite Element Models , 2012 .

[21]  A. Heinig,et al.  Interventional MRI of the breast: lesion localisation and biopsy , 2000, European Radiology.

[22]  L. Newman,et al.  Predictors of Re-excision among Women Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer , 2008, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[23]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[24]  Zeike A. Taylor,et al.  Application of Biomechanical Modelling to Image-Guided Breast Surgery , 2012 .

[25]  M. Doblaré,et al.  A finite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[26]  Thomas Kahn,et al.  Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience , 2004, European Radiology.

[27]  Vijay Rajagopal,et al.  Creating individual-specific biomechanical models of the breast for medical image analysis. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[28]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Fast free-form deformation using graphics processing units , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[29]  A. Gefen,et al.  Mechanics of the normal woman's breast. , 2007, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[30]  Tanja Alderliesten,et al.  On the feasibility of MRI-guided navigation to demarcate breast cancer for breast-conserving surgery. , 2010, Medical physics.

[31]  C P Tsui,et al.  A 3D skeletal muscle model coupled with active contraction of muscle fibres and hyperelastic behaviour. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  K. Cleary,et al.  Image-Guided Procedures : A Review , 2006 .

[33]  M. Sabel,et al.  Essentials of Breast Surgery: A Volume in the Surgical Foundations Series , 2009 .

[34]  A. Luini,et al.  Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1,973 patients. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[35]  J. Michael Fitzpatrick,et al.  Fiducial registration error and target registration error are uncorrelated , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[36]  Ken Jackson,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Skeletal Muscle for Computer Graphics: A Survey , 2012, Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vis..

[37]  Martyn P. Nash,et al.  Breast Image Registration by Combining Finite Elements and Free-Form Deformations , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[38]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  A Framework for Image-Guided Breast Surgery , 2006, MIAR.