Submitted: 2011-08-08 Accepted: 2011-11-24 Reducing Interpolation Artifacts for Mutual Information Based Image Registration

Medical image registration methods which use mutual information as similarity measure have been improved in recent decades. Mutual Information is a basic concept of Information theory which indicates the dependency of two random variables (or two images). In order to evaluate the mutual information of two images their joint probability distribution is required. Several interpolation methods, such as Partial Volume (PV) and bilinear, are used to estimate joint probability distribution. Both of these two methods yield some artifacts on mutual information function. Partial Volume-Hanning window (PVH) and Generalized Partial Volume (GPV) methods are introduced to remove such artifacts. In this paper we show that the acceptable performance of these methods is not due to their kernel function. It's because of the number of pixels which incorporate in interpolation. Since using more pixels requires more complex and time consuming interpolation process, we propose a new interpolation method which uses only four pixels (the same as PV and bilinear interpolations) and removes most of the artifacts. Experimental results of the registration of Computed Tomography (CT) images show superiority of the proposed scheme.

[1]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  Further Analysis of Interpolation Effects in Mutual Information-Based Image Registration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[3]  Roberto Brunelli,et al.  Template Matching Techniques in Computer Vision: Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[4]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Nonrigid Image Registration Using Conditional Mutual Information , 2007, IPMI.

[5]  Rodney A. Kennedy,et al.  A SURVEY OF MEDICAL IMAGE REGISTRATION ON MULTI-CORE AND GPU , 2009 .

[6]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Richard Bowden,et al.  Estimating the Joint Statistics of Images Using Nonparametric Windows with Application to Registration Using Mutual Information , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Nasser Kehtarnavaz,et al.  Brain Functional Localization: A Survey of Image Registration Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Xuesong Lu,et al.  Mutual information-based multimodal image registration using a novel joint histogram estimation , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[10]  Jan Flusser,et al.  Image registration methods: a survey , 2003, Image Vis. Comput..

[11]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Interpolation Artefacts in Mutual Information-Based Image Registration , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[12]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[13]  Richard Bowden,et al.  Simultaneous modeling and tracking (SMAT) of feature sets , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[14]  Aarnout Brombacher,et al.  Probability... , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[15]  Ma Bin-rong,et al.  A review of medical image registration , 1999 .

[16]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Mutual information-based CT-MR brain image registration using generalized partial volume joint histogram estimation , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  M. Fitzpatrick A Review of Medical Image Registration , 1993 .

[18]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.