A model for airline seat control considering revenue uncertainty and risk

Most revenue management (RM) models rely on the concept of marginal seat revenue and the assumption of risk neutrality to develop an expected-revenue maximisation policy for airline seat-inventory control. For the single-leg dynamic RM problem, this study developed a modified seat control policy to take risk into consideration by discounting the marginal seat revenue and relaxing the optimality condition in the dynamic programming model. The effectiveness of the modified policy was examined by a series of simulation experiments. In particular, another risk-aversion RM model with the objective of utility maximisation was tested. The simulation analysis shows that both models can balance expected revenue and revenue variation in a systematic way so as to address risk-aversion preferences of different airlines.

[1]  Marvin Rothstein,et al.  OR Forum - OR and the Airline Overbooking Problem , 1985, Oper. Res..

[2]  Samuel E. Bodily,et al.  A Taxonomy and Research Overview of Perishable-Asset Revenue Management: Yield Management, Overbooking, and Pricing , 1992, Oper. Res..

[3]  K. Talluri,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management , 2004 .

[4]  Cynthia Barnhart,et al.  Applications of Operations Research in the Air Transport Industry , 2003, Transp. Sci..

[5]  Barry C. Smith,et al.  Yield Management at American Airlines , 1992 .

[6]  Larry Weatherford Additional Paper: EMSR versus EMSU: Revenue or utility? , 2004 .

[7]  Wen-Chyuan Chiang,et al.  An overview of research on revenue management: current issues and future research , 2007 .

[8]  Jeffrey I. McGill,et al.  Revenue Management: Research Overview and Prospects , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Renwick E. Curry,et al.  Optimal Airline Seat Allocation with Fare Classes Nested by Origins and Destinations , 1990, Transp. Sci..

[10]  J. Lancaster,et al.  The financial risk of airline revenue management , 2003 .

[11]  Jeffrey I. McGill,et al.  Airline Seat Allocation with Multiple Nested Fare Classes , 1993, Oper. Res..

[12]  Baichun Xiao,et al.  Maximizing Revenues of Perishable Assets with a Risk Factor , 1999, Oper. Res..

[13]  Matthias Koenig,et al.  List pricing versus dynamic pricing: Impact on the revenue risk , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Richard D. Wollmer,et al.  An Airline Seat Management Model for a Single Leg Route When Lower Fare Classes Book First , 1992, Oper. Res..

[15]  Christiane Barz,et al.  Risk-sensitive capacity control in revenue management , 2007, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[16]  Peter Belobaba,et al.  OR Practice - Application of a Probabilistic Decision Model to Airline Seat Inventory Control , 1989, Oper. Res..

[17]  Marvin Hersh,et al.  A Model for Dynamic Airline Seat Inventory Control with Multiple Seat Bookings , 1993, Transp. Sci..

[18]  Yuri Levin,et al.  Risk in Revenue Management and Dynamic Pricing , 2008, Oper. Res..

[19]  Janakiram Subramanian,et al.  Airline Yield Management with Overbooking, Cancellations, and No-Shows , 1999, Transp. Sci..