A Study on the Influence of Construction Workers' Physiological Status and Jobsite Environment on Behavior and Performance

Understanding processes affecting workforce behavior and performance in terms of productivity, safety, and quality is of central importance to the social and economic sustainability of the construction industry. Existing theories stress the role of worker behavior in determining performance (e.g., accident causation theories), and identify several factors influencing behavior and performance. However, most of these theories are limited in scope and often tend to be confined within one discipline neglecting factors beyond the discipline’s domain. Also, models often comprise relationships based on anecdotal evidence or heuristic approaches that are not fully clarified. Moreover, previous research studies on workers never analyzed the role played by worker’s physiological status and jobsite physical, ergonomic and environmental stressors on behavior and performance. By building on existing knowledge, the long-term objective of the authors is to generate an effective and comprehensive behavior-performance model. The first step taken by the authors to accomplish this long-term objective focuses on generating an experimental program to model the relationship between worker productivity, safety, and quality behavior and performance, and the influence of worker’s physiological status and jobsite physical environmental stressors on behavior and performance. The aim of this paper is to describe the experimental program research plan.

[1]  Igal M. Shohet,et al.  What does the construction foreman do , 1991 .

[2]  William F. Maloney Productivity Improvement: The Influence of Labor , 1983 .

[3]  P. Åstrand,et al.  Textbook of Work Physiology , 1970 .

[4]  E. Bettinghaus,et al.  Health promotion and the knowledge-attitude-behavior continuum. , 1986, Preventive medicine.

[5]  David Arditi,et al.  Total quality management in the construction process , 1997 .

[6]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[7]  Tao Cheng,et al.  Data Fusion of Real-Time Location Sensing and Physiological Status Monitoring for Ergonomics Analysis of Construction Workers , 2013, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[8]  Josefinne Lund,et al.  Accident prevention. Presentation of a model placing emphasis on human, structural and cultural factors , 2004 .

[9]  Tariq S. Abdelhamid,et al.  Physiological Demands during Construction Work , 2002 .

[10]  Giovanni C. Migliaccio,et al.  Using Workforce’s Physiological Strain Monitoring to Enhance Social Sustainability of Construction , 2013 .

[11]  Tao Cheng,et al.  Automated task-level activity analysis through fusion of real time location sensors and worker's tho , 2013 .

[12]  H. W. Parker,et al.  Productivity improvement in construction , 1988 .

[13]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Understanding accidents-from root causes to performance variability , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants.

[14]  R. Malcolm W. Horner,et al.  Modeling Construction Labor Productivity , 1990 .

[15]  Giovanni C. Migliaccio,et al.  An exploratory study of the relationship between construction workforce physical strain and task level productivity , 2014 .

[16]  James L. Jenkins,et al.  Productivity improvement through work sampling , 2004 .

[17]  William F. Maloney,et al.  Research Needs in Construction Worker Performance , 1983 .

[18]  R. A. Haslama,et al.  Contributing factors in construction accidents , 2005 .

[19]  Nora El-Gohary,et al.  Grand Challenges for Data Sensing and Analysis , 2011 .