Angular deformities and forearm function

Angular deformities were created in cadaver forearms at proximal, middle, and distal third levels of the radius and ulna separately, and at middle and distal third levels of both bones, to determine the corresponding limitations of pronation and supination. The ranges of pronation and supination were recorded using a rotational motion measurement apparatus instrumented with a 360° goniometer. These experimental results were compared to data obtained from clinical and radiographic examination of 105 patients with similar residual deformities following treatment of fractures by nonsurgical means, to evaluate the accuracy of the experimental model and to determine if loss of rotational motion could be predicted based on radiographic findings. With cadaver forearms, on the average, angulation of 10° of the radius or ulna in coronal or sagittal planes limited pronation and supination by <24°, whereas angulation of 10° of both the radius and the ulna limited pronation and supination by <18%. Comparison of experimental results with clinical findings showed that, despite the errors involved in measuring forearm deformities in patients using biplanar radiographs, the experimental results predicted the clinical loss of pronation and supination to within 17% for the fractures of the radius, and within 8% accuracy for the fractures of the ulna.

[1]  E. M. Evans ROTATIONAL DEFORMITY IN THE TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF BOTH BONES OF THE FOREARM , 1945 .

[2]  J. Christensen,et al.  A study of the interosseous distance between the radius and ulna during rotation of the forearm , 1968, The Anatomical record.

[3]  L. S. Matthews,et al.  The effect on supination-pronation of angular malalignment of fractures of both bones of the forearm. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  A. Charnley,et al.  TREATMENT OF FOREARM FRACTURES IN ADULTS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO PLATE FIXATION. , 1964, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  R. Johnson,et al.  Rotation of the forearm; an experimental study of pronation and supination. , 1951, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  P. H. Brakenbury,et al.  The treatment of isolated fractures of the ulnar shaft in adults. , 1981, Injury.

[7]  A. Sarmiento,et al.  Forearm fractures. Early functional bracing - A preliminary report. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  J. C. Hughston Fractures of the Forearm: Anatomical Considerations , 1962 .

[9]  J. Hughston Fracture of the distal radial shaft; mistakes in management. , 1957, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  J. Corea,et al.  Non-union of the isolated fracture of the ulnar shaft in adults. , 1981, Injury.

[11]  A. Sarmiento,et al.  Closed Functional Treatment of Fractures , 1981, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[12]  A. Sarmiento,et al.  The effects of angular and rotational deformities of both bones of the forearm. An in vitro study. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  J PATRICK,et al.  A study of supination and pronation, with especial reference to the treatment of forearm fractures. , 1946, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  T. Grace,et al.  Forearm fractures: treatment by rigid fixation with early motion. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  H. S. Dodge,et al.  Treatment of fractures of the radius and ulna with compression plates. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  E. Chao,et al.  A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.