Determinants of Disciplinary Discontent

Selon les disciplines universitaires, il existe de substantielles variations dans la perception de la facon dont un champ peut stagner. Cet article tente d'expliquer ces differences de pessimisme par une theorie mettant en cause une variation dans l'anomie et le consensus au niveau du champ lui-meme. Le fait qu'il s'agisse d'un champ se situant dans une discipline fondamentale ou appliquee a egalement son importance. Enfin, il est montre que les determinants se situant au niveau du champ ont une influence bien plus importante que les facteurs d'ordre individuels

[1]  R. Merton.  Social Structure and Anomie , 1938 .

[2]  Marian Williams,et al.  Graduate Education in the United States , 1961 .

[3]  W. Hagstrom,et al.  Anomy in Scientific Communities , 1964 .

[4]  N. Storer.  The hard sciences and the soft: some sociological observations. , 1967, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[5]  C. S. Fisher,et al.  The Last Invariant Theorists A sociological study of the collećtive biographies of mathematical specialiśts , 1967, European Journal of Sociology.

[6]  R. Merton,et al.  Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system , 1971 .

[7]  A. Cartter.  Faculty Needs and Resources in American Higher Education , 1972 .

[8]  Janice Beyer Lodahl,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. , 1972 .

[9]  S. Lipset,et al.  Politics of academic natural scientists and engineers. , 1972, Science.

[10]  A. Biglan.  The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .

[11]  A. Biglan.  Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. , 1973 .

[12]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Patterns of Scientific Research: A Comparative Analysis of Research in Three Scientific Fields. , 1976 .

[13]  Roland J. Liebert.  Productivity, Favor, and Grants Among Scholars , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal Publication in Three Scientific Disciplines , 1977 .

[15]  Burt V. Bronk,et al.  Hierarchy of sciences , 1977 .

[16]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Administrative Turnover as a Response to Unmanaged Organizational Interdependence , 1980 .

[17]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Average Tenure of Academic Department Heads: The Effects of Paradigm, Size, and Departmental Demography. , 1980 .

[18]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Scientific Consensus and Academic Status Attainment Patterns. , 1982 .

[19]  Barbara Entwisle,et al.  Contextual analysis through the multilevel linear model. , 1983 .

[20]  R. Collins.  Is 1980s Sociology in the Doldrums? , 1986, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  Alan E. Bayer,et al.  The “Biglan model” and the smart messenger: A case study of eponym diffusion , 1987 .

[22]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Age and research productivity of academic scientists , 1989 .

[23]  J. Turner.  The Disintegration of American Sociology , 1989 .

[24]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. , 1989 .

[25]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[26]  A. M. Lomperis,et al.  Are Women Changing the Nature of the Academic Profession , 1990 .

[27]  Gender segregation by field in higher education , 1990 .

[28]  J. Turner,et al.  The Impossible Science: An Institutional Analysis of American Sociology , 1990 .

[29]  J. Z. Shapiro,et al.  Are Retrenchment Decisions Rational? The Role of Information in Times of Budgetary Stress. , 1990 .

[30]  S. Fuchs,et al.  The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge , 1992 .