Extending coupled hydrological-hydraulic model chains with a surrogate model for the estimation of flood losses

Abstract In comparison to a local-scale flood risk analysis, modeling flood losses and risks at the river basin scale is challenging. Particularly in mountainous watersheds, extreme precipitation can be distributed spatially and temporally with remarkable variability. Depending on the topography of the river basin and the topological characteristics of the river network, certain rainfall patterns can lead to a synchronization of the flood peaks between tributaries and the main river. Thus, these complex interactions can lead to high variability in flood losses. In addition, flood inundation modeling at the river basin scale is computationally resource-intensive and the simulation of multiple scenarios is not always feasible. In this study, we present an approach for reducing complexity in flood-risk modeling at the river basin scale. We developed a surrogate model for flood loss analysis in the river basin by decomposing the river system into a number of subsystems. A relationship between flood magnitude and flood losses is computed for each floodplain in the river basin by means of a flood inundation and flood loss model at sub-meter resolution. This surrogate model for flood-loss estimation can be coupled with a hydrological-hydraulic model cascade, allowing to compute a high number of flood scenarios for the whole river system. The application of this model to a complex mountain river basin showed that the surrogate model approach leads to a reliable and computationally fast analysis of flood losses in a set of probable maximum precipitation scenarios. Hence, this approach offers new possibilities for stress test analyses and Monte-Carlo simulations in the analysis of system behavior under different system loads.

[1]  J. Yazdi,et al.  Adaptive surrogate modeling for optimization of flood control detention dams , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  M. Demissie,et al.  Coupling of hydrologic and hydraulic models for the Illinois River Basin , 2007 .

[3]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Ambio.

[4]  N. M. J. Crout,et al.  Is my model too complex? Evaluating model formulation using model reduction , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Review of surrogate modeling in water resources , 2012 .

[6]  Andreas Paul Zischg,et al.  The effect of coupling hydrologic and hydrodynamic models on probable maximum flood estimation , 2017 .

[7]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach , 2012 .

[8]  P. E. O'Connell,et al.  Towards modelling flood protection investment as a coupled human and natural system , 2014 .

[9]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Multiobjective optimisation on a budget: Exploring surrogate modelling for robust multi-reservoir rules generation under hydrological uncertainty , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Computationally efficient modelling of tidal rivers using conceptual reservoir-type models , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Ian Pattison,et al.  The role of tributary relative timing and sequencing in controlling large floods , 2014 .

[12]  Hoshin Vijai Gupta,et al.  Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling , 2009 .

[13]  Rolf Weingartner,et al.  An introduction to the hydrological modelling system PREVAH and its pre- and post-processing-tools , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  K. M. de Bruijn,et al.  Uncertainty in flood damage estimates and its potential effect on investment decisions , 2015 .

[15]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  A strategy to improve the contribution of complex simulation models to ecological theory , 2005 .

[16]  Qing Zhu,et al.  An integrated flood management system based on linking environmental models and disaster-related data , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  A general framework for Dynamic Emulation Modelling in environmental problems , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[19]  S. Calmant,et al.  Large‐scale hydrologic and hydrodynamic modeling of the Amazon River basin , 2013 .

[20]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  Benjamin Fersch,et al.  Fully coupled atmospheric‐hydrological modeling at regional and long‐term scales: Development, application, and analysis of WRF‐HMS , 2016 .

[22]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  A high‐resolution global flood hazard model† , 2015, Water resources research.

[23]  Andrea Castelletti,et al.  Emulation techniques for the reduction and sensitivity analysis of complex environmental models , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Guido Felder,et al.  Assessment of deterministic PMF modelling approaches , 2017 .

[25]  P. Bates,et al.  A first large‐scale flood inundation forecasting model , 2013 .

[26]  Raveendra Kumar Rai,et al.  Evaluation of the Adequacy of Statistical Distribution Functions for Deriving Unit Hydrograph , 2009 .

[27]  U. Strasser,et al.  Coupled component modelling for inter- and transdisciplinary climate change impact research: Dimensions of integration and examples of interface design , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[28]  Reinhard Mechler,et al.  Reviewing estimates of the economic efficiency of disaster risk management: opportunities and limitations of using risk-based cost–benefit analysis , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[29]  Andreas Paul Zischg,et al.  Identifying spatial clusters of flood exposure to support decision making in risk management. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  Jin Teng,et al.  An integrated modelling framework for regulated river systems , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  Rolf Weingartner,et al.  Retrospective analysis of a nonforecasted rain-on-snow flood in the Alps – a matter of model limitations or unpredictable nature? , 2013 .

[32]  B. Merz,et al.  Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings , 2004 .

[33]  Etienne Leblois,et al.  Influence of rainfall spatial variability on rainfall–runoff modelling: Benefit of a simulation approach? , 2015 .

[34]  P. Bates,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models , 2015 .

[35]  H. Moel,et al.  Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates , 2011 .

[36]  D. Dutta,et al.  A mathematical model for flood loss estimation , 2003 .

[37]  P. Bates,et al.  Large-scale coupled hydrologic and hydraulic modelling of the Ob river in Siberia , 2009 .

[38]  Blesson Varghese,et al.  Computing probable maximum loss in catastrophe reinsurance portfolios on multi‐core and many‐core architectures , 2016, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[39]  Hervé Andrieu,et al.  Influence of the spatial variability of rainfall on hydrograph modelling at catchment outlet: a case study in the Cevennes region, France , 2016 .

[40]  J. A. Breña-Naranjo,et al.  Propagation of hydro-meteorological uncertainty in a model cascade framework to inundation prediction , 2015 .

[41]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[42]  Peter Salamon,et al.  Modelling the socio-economic impact of river floods in Europe , 2016 .

[43]  Kathleen Stewart,et al.  Modeling spatiotemporal patterns of building vulnerability and content evacuations before a riverine flood disaster , 2014 .

[44]  Patrick Willems,et al.  Modular conceptual modelling approach and software for river hydraulic simulations , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[45]  Javier Garcia Hernandez,et al.  Relevance of the correlation between precipitation and the 0 °C isothermal altitude for extreme flood estimation , 2017 .

[46]  Arthur van Dam,et al.  Flood inference simulation using surrogate modelling for the Yellow River multiple reservoir system , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[47]  P. Willems,et al.  Probabilistic flood risk assessment over large geographical regions , 2013 .

[48]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  A high resolution coupled hydrologic-hydraulic model (HiResFlood-UCI) for flash flood modeling , 2016 .

[49]  Jörn Birkmann,et al.  Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[50]  S. Foudi,et al.  Integrated spatial flood risk assessment: The case of Zaragoza , 2015 .

[51]  P. Bates,et al.  Quantifying local rainfall dynamics and uncertain boundary conditions into a nested regional‐local flood modeling system , 2017 .

[52]  Bertrand Iooss,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis for models with spatially dependent outputs , 2009, 0911.1189.

[53]  Anne-Catherine Favre,et al.  Flood type specific construction of synthetic design hydrographs , 2017 .

[54]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis , 2016, Environmental Research Letters.

[55]  Christos Makropoulos,et al.  Surrogate-enhanced evolutionary annealing simplex algorithm for effective and efficient optimization of water resources problems on a budget , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[56]  Y. Hundecha,et al.  Spatially coherent flood risk assessment based on long-term continuous simulation with a coupled model chain , 2015 .

[57]  P. Bates,et al.  Evaluating the effect of scale in flood inundation modelling in urban environments , 2008 .

[58]  Hannu Hyyppä,et al.  Uncertainties in flood risk mapping: a case study on estimating building damages for a river flood in Finland , 2010 .

[59]  L. Feyen,et al.  Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world , 2017 .

[60]  Andreas Paul Zischg,et al.  Spatiotemporal aspects of flood exposure in Switzerland , 2016 .

[61]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Problems with binary pattern measures for flood model evaluation , 2014 .

[62]  Francesco Serinaldi,et al.  Synthetic Design Hydrographs Based on Distribution Functions with Finite Support , 2011 .

[63]  Hilary McMillan,et al.  End‐to‐end flood risk assessment: A coupled model cascade with uncertainty estimation , 2008 .

[64]  Patrick Willems,et al.  A data driven approach using Takagi–Sugeno models for computationally efficient lumped floodplain modelling , 2013 .

[65]  Sebastiaan N. Jonkman,et al.  Integrated Hydrodynamic and Economic Modelling of Flood Damage in The Netherlands , 2008 .

[66]  Y. Hundecha,et al.  Continuous, large‐scale simulation model for flood risk assessments: proof‐of‐concept , 2016 .

[67]  Saralees Nadarajah,et al.  Probability models for unit hydrograph derivation , 2007 .

[68]  H. Kling,et al.  Runoff conditions in the upper Danube basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios , 2012 .

[69]  Andreas Paul Zischg,et al.  Natural Hazard Management from a Coevolutionary Perspective: Exposure and Policy Response in the European Alps , 2016, Annals of the American Association of Geographers.

[70]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  The impact of uncertain precipitation data on insurance loss estimates using a flood catastrophe model , 2014 .

[71]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Numerical assessment of metamodelling strategies in computationally intensive optimization , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[72]  Brenden Jongman,et al.  Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity , 2013 .

[73]  Andreas Paul Zischg,et al.  Monitoring the temporal development of natural hazard risks as a basis indicator for climate change adaptation , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[74]  B. Merz,et al.  Flood risk curves and uncertainty bounds , 2009 .

[75]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Multi-variate flood damage assessment: a tree-based data-mining approach , 2013 .

[76]  Chandranath Chatterjee,et al.  Flood hazard assessment with multiparameter approach derived from coupled 1D and 2D hydrodynamic flow model , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[77]  Ilan Kelman,et al.  Does mitigation save? Reviewing cost-benefit analyses of disaster risk reduction , 2014 .

[78]  Keith Beven,et al.  Probabilistic flood risk mapping including spatial dependence , 2013 .

[79]  Ioana Popescu,et al.  Modeling the Inference between Upstream Inflow Hydrographs and Downstream Flooded Areas in a Reservoir Driven System , 2014 .

[80]  William H. McAnally,et al.  Nested Hydrodynamic Modeling of a Coastal River Applying Dynamic-Coupling , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[81]  David Salze,et al.  A coupling of hydrologic and hydraulic models appropriate for the fast floods of the Gardon River basin (France) , 2014 .

[82]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  When does spatial resolution become spurious in probabilistic flood inundation predictions? , 2016 .

[83]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Characterising performance of environmental models , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[84]  P. Bates,et al.  Quantifying the importance of spatial resolution and other factors through global sensitivity analysis of a flood inundation model , 2016 .

[85]  Frédéric Grelot,et al.  Multi-scale spatial sensitivity analysis of a model for economic appraisal of flood risk management policies , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[86]  Guido Felder,et al.  An approach for the determination of precipitation input for worst-case flood modelling , 2016 .

[87]  A. Thieken,et al.  Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas , 2013 .

[88]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial moments of catchment rainfall: rainfall spatial organisation, basin morphology, and flood response , 2011 .

[89]  Andreas Paul Zischg,et al.  Validation of 2D flood models with insurance claims , 2018 .