Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation does not improve prolonged P300 latencies in Parkinson's disease

Abstract Bilateral deep brain stimulation is an effective treatment for most motor signs of Parkinson's disease (PD), but the effects on cognitive functions are less clear. We therefore examined the effects of bilateral deep brain stimulation on central information processing, using the event-related auditory P300 potential as an electrophysiological index of mental chronometry. Eight PD patients with bilateral stimulators within the subthalamic nuclei (STN) and eight age-matched controls participated. Patients were examined after overnight withdrawal of antiparkinson medication, both “on” and “off” stimulation (in random sequence). The P300 and reaction times were recorded using an auditory oddball paradigm. P300 latencies were prolonged in PD patients off stimulation (440 ± 45 ms) compared to controls (397 ± 16 ms; P < 0.05). STN stimulation significantly reduced clinical disease severity (as indexed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) and markedly improved reaction times, but did not improve the prolonged P300 latencies in PD patients (429 ± 36 ms). These results confirm that P300 latencies are prolonged in PD. Significantly, bilateral STN stimulation did not improve this electrophysiological measure of cognitive impairment, even though motor disability was markedly reduced. This suggests that some dopa-responsive features are resistant to STN stimulation, possibly due to involvement of dopaminergic deficits outside the nigrostriatal pathway, which are not influenced by outflow from the STN.

[1]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[2]  Y. Kuroiwa,et al.  Visual event-related potentials in progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, striatonigral degeneration, and Parkinson's disease , 2000, Journal of Neurology.

[3]  F E Bloom,et al.  P300 latency reflects the degree of cognitive decline in dementing illness. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  Y. Kuroiwa,et al.  Effect of interstimulus interval on visual P300 in Parkinson’s disease , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  H Bauer,et al.  Technical requirements for high-quality scalp DC recordings. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  T. Takasu,et al.  Effects of intravenous L-dopa on P300 and regional cerebral blood flow in parkinsonism. , 1996, The International journal of neuroscience.

[7]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Dopamine modulates CA1 hippocampal neurons by elevating the threshold for spike generation: An in vitro study , 1984, Neuroscience.

[8]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Age and stage dependency of P300 latency alterations in non-demented Parkinson's disease patients without therapy. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  K. Syndulko,et al.  Cognition in Parkinson disease: An event‐related potential perspective , 1982, Annals of neurology.

[10]  Event-related potentials in Parkinson's disease. , 1996, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  D S Goodin,et al.  Electrophysiological differences between demented and nondemented patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[12]  Michael J. Aminoff,et al.  Electrophysiological dfierences between demented and nondemented patients with Parkinson's disease , 1987 .

[13]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[14]  A. Lang,et al.  Surgery for Parkinson disease: A critical evaluation of the state of the art. , 2000, Archives of neurology.

[15]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Influence of dopaminergic medication on automatic postural responses and balance impairment in Parkinson's disease , 1996, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[16]  R. Leiguarda,et al.  Evoked potentials, reaction time and cognitive performance in on and off phases of Parkinson's disease. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[17]  S. Fahn Members of the UPDRS Development Committee. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale , 1987 .

[18]  P. Stanzione,et al.  P300 variations in parkinsonian patients before and during dopaminergic monotherapy: a suggested dopamine component in P300. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  P. Svasek,et al.  PC-Supported 64-Channel DC-EEG Amplifier , 1991, MIE.

[20]  J. Rohrbaugh,et al.  Endogenous potentials generated in the human hippocampal formation and amygdala by infrequent events. , 1980, Science.

[21]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The impact of deep brain stimulation on executive function in Parkinson's disease. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  A L Benabid,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus or internal pallidal stimulation in young onset Parkinson's disease. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  J. Polich P300 clinical utility and control of variability. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[24]  A. Benabid,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson's disease. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  A L Benabid,et al.  Neuropsychological changes between “off” and “on” STN or GPi stimulation in Parkinson’s disease , 2000, Neurology.

[26]  Y. Agid,et al.  Doescognitive impairment inParkinson's disease result fromnon-dopaminergic lesions? , 1989 .

[27]  L. Brown,et al.  Sensory and cognitive functions of the basal ganglia , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  R. Verleger,et al.  Reduction of P3b in patients with temporo-parietal lesions. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  G. Kim,et al.  Dopaminergic influences on the P300 abnormality in Parkinson's disease , 1998, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[30]  A. Tröster,et al.  Cognitive Outcomes after Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: A Review of Initial Studies and Recommendations for Future Research , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  C. Marsden The mysterious motor function of the basal ganglia , 1982, Neurology.

[32]  A L Benabid,et al.  Bilateral subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson's disease affects neither memory nor executive functions: A consecutive series of 62 patients , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[33]  M R Nuwer,et al.  IFCN recommended standards for long-latency auditory event-related potentials. Report of an IFCN committee. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  W Lang,et al.  Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation improves frontal cortex function in Parkinson's disease. An electrophysiological study of the contingent negative variation. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.