Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.

The acceptable range of speech level as a function of background noise level was investigated on the basis of word intelligibility scores and listening difficulty ratings. In the present study, the acceptable range is defined as the range that maximizes word intelligibility scores and simultaneously does not cause a significant increase in listening difficulty ratings from the minimum ratings. Listening tests with young adult and elderly listeners demonstrated the following. (1) The acceptable range of speech level for elderly listeners overlapped that for young listeners. (2) The lower limit of the acceptable speech level for both young and elderly listeners was 65 dB (A-weighted) for noise levels of 40 and 45 dB (A-weighted), a level with a speech-to-noise ratio of +15 dB for noise levels of 50 and 55 dB, and a level with a speech-to-noise ratio of +10 dB for noise levels from 60 to 70 dB. (3) The upper limit of the acceptable speech level for both young and elderly listeners was 80 dB for noise levels from 40 to 55 dB and 85 dB or above for noise levels from 55 to 70 dB.

[1]  R. Carhart.  Volume control adjustment in hearing aid selection , 1946, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase Relations upon the Masking of Speech by White Noise , 1948 .

[3]  L. L. Kopra,et al.  Effects of method of measurement on most comfortable loudness level for speech. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  Heinrich Kuttruff,et al.  Room acoustics , 1973 .

[5]  John Greer Clark,et al.  Introduction to Audiology , 1975 .

[6]  D D Dirks,et al.  Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[7]  E. van Heusden,et al.  Effect of ambient noise on the vocal output and the preferred listening level of conversational speech , 1979 .

[8]  I. Shapiro.  Comparison of Three Hearing Aid Prescription Procedures , 1980, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Beattie Rc.  Comfortable speech listening levels: effects of competition and instruction. , 1982 .

[10]  E Zwicker,et al.  Why can a decrease in dB(A) produce an increase in loudness? , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C A Sammeth,et al.  Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[12]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  John H. Grose,et al.  Masking Level Differences for Tones and Speech in Elderly Listeners With Relatively Normal Audiograms , 1994 .

[14]  D. Grantham,et al.  Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B. Rakerd,et al.  Most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels: Six decades of research , 2004 .

[17]  Masayuki Morimoto,et al.  Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Optimum speech level to minimize listening difficulty in public spaces. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M. Morimoto,et al.  Effects of spatial factors of speech, noise, and reverberation sounds on listening difficulty , 2008 .