Excess height versus cluster extent in subtraction SPECT

Subtraction of ictal and interictal SPECT perfusion images of the brain has the potential of locating the epileptogenic region. This region generally shows large differences between both images. However, differences can also be induced by noise in the projection data. We hypothesized that the extent, besides the intensity, of observed clusters of voxels in thresholded subtraction images, is an important parameter in the classification of clusters into real perfusion differences and noise induced differences. To test this hypothesis, we performed a number of simulation experiments. Using a Monte Carlo approach, we constructed cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of the excess height (i.e. the largest difference in a cluster) and the cluster extent under the condition of no perfusion change (i.e. only noise induced clusters). The reproducibility of the CDF curves was shown using measured patient data. Furthermore, a 3D brain software phantom experiment was used to examine the detection and classification of an induced region of hyperperfusion. We assigned to every observed cluster a probability, derived from the CDF curves, for excess height and extent. For different probability thresholds, sensitivity and specificity of the detection of the induced hyperperfusion based on its probability for excess height and cluster extent was measured. These measurements were combined in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. These ROC curves showed a better performance when using classification based on cluster extent. We conclude that the cluster extent is an important parameter in the characterization of clusters in thresholded subtraction of perfusion SPECT images of the brain.

[1]  G F Morgan,et al.  SPECT brain imaging in epilepsy: a meta-analysis. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  P. Roland,et al.  Three‐dimensional analysis of clustered voxels in 15O‐butanol brain activation images , 1993 .

[3]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Andrew P. Holmes,et al.  Statistical issues in functional brain mapping. , 1994 .

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping in functional neuroimaging: beyond PET and fMRI activation studies. , 1998, European journal of nuclear medicine.

[6]  B H Brinkmann,et al.  Subtraction SPECT co-registered to MRI improves postictal SPECT localization of seizure foci , 1999, Neurology.

[7]  I Gardin,et al.  Use of subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI for optimizing the localization of seizure foci in children. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  C. Jack,et al.  Subtraction ictal SPECT co‐registered to MRI improves clinical usefulness of SPECT in localizing the surgical seizure focus , 1998, Neurology.

[9]  B. Brinkmann,et al.  Subtraction peri-ictal SPECT is predictive of extratemporal epilepsy surgery outcome , 2000, Neurology.

[10]  B. F. Hutton,et al.  Improved efficiency for MRI-SPET registration based on mutual information , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  C A Roe,et al.  Statistical Comparison of Two ROC-curve Estimates Obtained from Partially-paired Datasets , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[12]  J B Poline,et al.  Analysis of Individual Positron Emission Tomography Activation Maps by Detection of High Signal-to-Noise-Ratio Pixel Clusters , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[13]  Lee-Tzuu Chang,et al.  A Method for Attenuation Correction in Radionuclide Computed Tomography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  B H Brinkmann,et al.  Voxel significance mapping using local image variances in subtraction ictal SPET , 2000, Nuclear medicine communications.

[15]  B H Brinkmann,et al.  Subtraction ictal SPET co‐registered to MRI in partial epilepsy: Description and technical validation of the method with phantom and patient studies , 1998, Nuclear medicine communications.

[16]  Eileen O. Smith,et al.  Difference images calculated from ictal and interictal technetium-99m-HMPAO SPECT scans of epilepsy. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  I G Zubal,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of quantitative difference SPECT analysis in seizure localization. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.