Robust integration of real gas models into a pressure-based coupled solver

Today’s most common standard for compressible computational fluid dynamics is based on the ideal gas state equation. However, real gas modeling is fundamental for a wide range of applications. When expanding into the thermodynamic region of non-ideal gas, performance predictions based on ideal gas assumption are no longer valid. Therefore, more accurate models are desired for an improved classification of fluid properties. While there is a wast amount of literature about possible improvements when using real gas state equations in a numerical framework, little is known considering the actual implementation. This article will therefore focus on the robust integration of real gas flow physics in an in-house, coupled, pressure-based solver. We will point out the main difference to a numerical framework purely based on perfect gas. Final validation is given using a two stage radial compressor setup to demonstrate the generality of the chosen approach.

[1]  M. Darwish,et al.  An OpenFOAM pressure-based coupled CFD solver for turbulent and compressible flows in turbomachinery applications , 2016 .

[2]  K. E. Starling,et al.  Applications of kinetic gas theories and multiparameter correlation for prediction of dilute gas viscosity and thermal conductivity , 1984 .

[3]  K. Kobe The properties of gases and liquids , 1959 .

[4]  G. Soave Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state , 1972 .

[5]  Emilie Sauret,et al.  CFD Simulation of a Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Radial-Inflow Turbine, Comparing the Results of Using Real Gas Equation of Estate and Real Gas Property File , 2016 .

[6]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[7]  M. Darwish,et al.  Development of a Novel Fully Coupled Solver in OpenFOAM: Steady-State Incompressible Turbulent Flows , 2014 .

[8]  K. E. Starling,et al.  Generalized multiparameter correlation for nonpolar and polar fluid transport properties , 1988 .

[9]  Sanford Gordon,et al.  NASA Glenn Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Species , 2002 .

[10]  B. Rogg,et al.  Real gas CFD simulations of hydrogen/oxygen supercritical combustion , 2013 .

[11]  J. F. Mayer,et al.  Wetness loss prediction for a low pressure steam turbine using computational fluid dynamics , 2014 .

[12]  Juergen Koehler,et al.  Numerical investigation of a two-phase CO2 ejector , 2014 .

[13]  T. Turunen-Saaresti,et al.  Effects of Real Gas Model Accuracy and Operating Conditions on Supercritical CO2 Compressor Performance and Flow Field , 2017 .

[14]  J. R. Travis,et al.  Real-gas Equations-of-State for the GASFLOW CFD code , 2013 .

[15]  M. Darwish,et al.  Development of a Novel Fully Coupled Solver in OpenFOAM: Steady-State Incompressible Turbulent Flows in Rotational Reference Frames , 2014 .

[16]  C. Rhie,et al.  Numerical Study of the Turbulent Flow Past an Airfoil with Trailing Edge Separation , 1983 .

[17]  Stefano Rebay,et al.  Real-Gas Effects in ORC Turbine Flow Simulations: Influence of Thermodynamic Models on Flow Fields and Performance Parameters , 2006 .

[18]  Filippo Rubechini,et al.  Real Gas Effects in Turbomachinery Flows: A CFD Model for Fast Computations , 2003 .

[19]  D. Peng,et al.  A New Two-Constant Equation of State , 1976 .