The tale of Phineas Gage, digitally remastered.

The injury of Phineas Gage has fueled research on and fascination with the localization of cerebral functions in the past century and a half. Most physicians and anatomists believed that Gage sustained a largely bilateral injury to the frontal lobes. However, previous studies seem to have overlooked a few less obvious, but essential details. This has led us to reanalyze the injury using three-dimensional reconstruction and quantitative computer-aided techniques and to propose a new biomechanical model, in order to determine the location and extent of the injury and explain Gage's improbable survival. Unlike previous studies on this subject, our findings are based on computer-generated three-dimensional reconstructions of a thin-slice computed tomography scan (CAT) of Phineas Gage's skull. The results of our image analysis were corroborated with the clinical findings, thoroughly recorded by Dr. Harlow in 1848, as well as with a systematic examination of the original skull specimen. Our results show that the cerebral injury was limited to the left frontal lobe, did not extend to the contralateral side, did not affect the ventricular system, and did not involve vital intracranial vascular structures. Although modern neuroscience has perhaps outgrown the speculations prompted by this famous case, it is still a living part of the medical folklore and education. Setting the record straight based on clinical reasoning, observation of the physical evidence, and sound quantitative computational methods is more than mere minutia and of interest for the broad medical community.

[1]  N. Hata,et al.  An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and an open MR , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  R Kikinis,et al.  Surgical navigation in the open MRI. , 2003, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[3]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  A 3-D System for Planning and Simulating Minimally-Invasive Distraction Osteogenesis of the Facial Skeleton , 2000, MICCAI.

[4]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Image-guided surgery. , 1999 .

[5]  H. Bigelow Case of Recovery from the Passage of an Iron Bar through the Head , 1850, The Buffalo medical journal and monthly review of medical and surgical science.

[6]  M. Macmillan An Odd Kind of Fame , 2000 .

[7]  R. Kikinis,et al.  3D visualisation of the middle ear and adjacent structures using reconstructed multi-slice CT datasets, correlating 3D images and virtual endoscopy to the 2D cross-sectional images , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[8]  A. Damasio,et al.  The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. , 1994, Science.

[9]  J. Harlow Recovery from the passage of an iron bar through the head , 1993 .

[10]  T. Mammoto,et al.  Incidence of venous and paradoxical air embolism in neurosurgical patients in the sitting position: Detection by transesophageal echocardiography , 1998, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  Branislav Jaramaz,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2000 , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[12]  Malcolm Macmillan,et al.  An odd kind of fame : stories of Phineas Gage , 2000 .

[13]  M. Macmillan Inhibition and Phineas Gage: Repression and Sigmund Freud , 2004 .