Relation between dose of bendrofluazide, antihypertensive effect, and adverse biochemical effects.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the relevant dose of bendrofluazide for treating mild to moderate hypertension. DESIGN--Double blind parallel group trial of patients who were given placebo for six weeks and then randomly allocated to various doses of bendrofluazide (1.25, 2.5, 5, or 10 mg daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. SETTING--General practices in Zealand, Denmark. PATIENTS--257 Patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated hypertension, aged 25-70, who had a mean diastolic blood pressure of 100-120 mm Hg after receiving placebo for six weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Reduction in diastolic blood pressure and changes in biochemical variables (potassium, urate, glucose, fructosamine, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein A I, apolipoprotein B, and triglyceride concentrations). RESULTS--All doses of bendrofluazide significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure to the same degree (10-11 mm Hg). Clear relations between dose and effect were shown for potassium, urate, glucose, total cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B concentrations. The 1.25 mg dose increased only urate concentrations, whereas the 10 mg dose affected all the above biochemical variables. CONCLUSION--The relevant range of doses of bendrofluazide to treat mild to moderate hypertension is 1.25-2.5 mg a day. Higher doses caused more pronounced adverse biochemical effects including adverse lipid effects. Previous trials with bendrofluazide have used too high doses.

[1]  J. Cutler,et al.  The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  L. Wilkins Propranolol or hydrochlorothiazide alone for the initial treatment of hypertension. IV. Effect on plasma glucose and glucose tolerance. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. , 1985, Hypertension.

[3]  E. Freis,et al.  Thiazide therapy is not a cause of arrhythmia in patients with systemic hypertension. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  E. Raftery,et al.  TOTAL BODY AND SERUM POTASSIUM DURING PROLONGED THIAZIDE THERAPY FOR ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION , 1975, The Lancet.

[5]  E. Freis,et al.  Early changes in plasma and urinary potassium in diuretic-treated patients with systemic hypertension. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  J. Abernethy The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. , 1984, Hypertension.

[7]  D. McCarron Diuretic therapy for mild hypertension: the "real" cost of treatment. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  R. Ames Antihypertensive drugs and lipid profiles. , 1988, American journal of hypertension.

[9]  C. Berne,et al.  A comparison of the effects of hydrochlorothiazide and captopril on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with hypertension. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Ventricular extrasystoles during thiazide treatment: substudy of MRC mild hypertension trial. , 1983, British medical journal.

[11]  C. Lardinois,et al.  The effects of antihypertensive agents on serum lipids and lipoproteins. , 1988, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  W. I. Cranston,et al.  EFFECTS OF ORAL DIURETICS ON RAISED ARTERIAL PRESSURE. , 1963, Lancet.

[13]  J. Tuomilehto,et al.  Beta-blockers versus diuretics in hypertensive men: main results from the HAPPHY trial. , 1987, Journal of hypertension.

[14]  L. Wilhelmsen,et al.  Antihypertensive effect and side-effects of bendroflumethiazide and propranolol. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.

[15]  P. Gøtzsche,et al.  Rational choice of dose: insufficient background knowledge? , 1986, Rational drug therapy.