Utilization patterns of cervical cancer screening in Italy

The aim of this study is to identify the use of cervical cancer screening and sociodemographic determinants associated with proper screening, overscreening, and underscreening in the Italian target population. Cross-sectional data from the national last available survey ‘Health and use of health care in Italy,’ conducted between December 2004 and September 2005, were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the risk factors associated independently with Pap test utilization. Our final sample included 36 161 women aged 25–64 years. Among women who reported having a Pap smear at least once, 20 920 (81.6%) repeated the Pap smear after the first one: 15 454 (74.3%) more than once every 3 years (‘OVER’ screening) and 2599 (12.4%) less than once every 3 years (‘UNDER’ screening). Among the independent risk factors associated with ‘OVER’ screening were higher social class [odds ratio (OR)=1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.39], being a former smoker (OR=1.16, 95% CI 1.05–1.28), and having had two or more pregnancies in the last 5 years (OR=1.43, 95% CI 1.20–1.70), whereas ‘UNDER’ screening was associated with the age group of 55–64 years (OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.76–2.53) and being divorced (OR=1.32, 95% CI 1.02–1.71). Improving Pap test compliance according to the proper timing is important for future reduction in cervical cancer mortality.

[1]  S. Franceschi,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Summary of the supplements on HPV screening and vaccination , 2015, Papillomavirus Research.

[2]  P. Barbadoro,et al.  Caesarean Delivery in South Italy: Women without Choice. A Cross Sectional Survey , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  M. Schiffman,et al.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer , 2012 .

[4]  P. Barbadoro,et al.  Socio-Economic Determinants and Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms During Postpartum Period , 2012, Women & health.

[5]  G. Damiani,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[6]  R. Jiménez-García,et al.  Trend in cervical cancer screening in Spain (2003–2009) and predictors of adherence , 2012, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[7]  S. Gohmann A Comparison of Health Care in Canada and the United States: The Case of Pap Smears , 2010, Medical care.

[8]  N. Segnan,et al.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Second Edition—Summary Document , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  S. Preston,et al.  A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: systematic review. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  S. Rohrmann,et al.  Socio-demographic characteristics of participation in the opportunistic German cervical cancer screening programme: results from the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort , 2009, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[11]  K. Pantazis,et al.  Awareness of human papillomavirus infection, testing and vaccination in midwives and midwifery students in Greece , 2009, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[12]  M. Zunzunegui,et al.  Inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among urban Mexican women. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[13]  Z. Obermeyer,et al.  Coverage of Cervical Cancer Screening in 57 Countries: Low Average Levels and Large Inequalities , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[14]  R. Ancelle-Park,et al.  Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study , 2008, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[15]  C. Levin,et al.  Making the case for cervical cancer prevention: what about equity? , 2008, Reproductive health matters.

[16]  Kelly Ackerson,et al.  Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

[17]  M. Manos,et al.  Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  P. Briss,et al.  Nonadherence to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: What Are the Linkages to Chronic Disease Risk? , 2003, Preventing chronic disease.

[19]  P. Brennan,et al.  Meta‐analysis of social inequality and the risk of cervical cancer , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[20]  R. Taylor,et al.  Early cervical cancer rescreening , 2002, Journal of medical screening.

[21]  M. Clark,et al.  Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42-75: associations in the 1990-1994 National Health Interview Surveys. , 1999, Preventive medicine.

[22]  A. Proudfoot,et al.  CANCER OF THE UTERINE CERVIX , 1957, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[23]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[24]  S H Ross,et al.  Cervical Cancer Prevention , 2007 .

[25]  Á. Száz Minimal structures , generalized topologies , and ascending systems should not be studied without generalized uniformities , 2007 .

[26]  A. Miller The (in)efficiency of cervical screening in Europe. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[27]  N. Segnan,et al.  European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Europe against cancer programme. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[28]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.