Selective Impairments in Managerial Knowledge Following Pre-Frontal Cortex Damage

Script generation was investigated in patients with lesions in the prefrontal (n = 9) and posterior (n = 8) cortical regions and in normal subjects (n = 16). Three different activities ranging in degree of familiarity were studied. Frontal patients did not differ from patients with posterior lesion and Normal subjects in the number of actions evoked, mean evocation time, or centrality. Impairments in script information processing were observed only in patients with prefrontal lesions, and for the three types of scripts. Specifically these patients made errors in ordering actions in the correct temporal sequence, failed to close scripts and to remain within the stated boundaries, and made deviant estimates of action importance. The results suggest that pre-frontal cortical lesions provoke a selective impairment in managerial knowledge (Grafman, 1989) that may contribute to difficulties in the formulation and execution of plans.

[1]  H. Nelson.  A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects , 1976, Cortex.

[2]  T. Shallice,et al.  Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  B. Pillon,et al.  Human autonomy and the frontal lobes. Part I: Imitation and utilization behavior: A neuropsychological study of 75 patients , 1986, Annals of neurology.

[4]  P W Burgess,et al.  Unilateral frontal lobectomy can produce strategy application disorder. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[6]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Memory for routines , 1982 .

[7]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly adults , 1987, Brain and Language.

[8]  J. Grafman.  Plans, Actions, and Mental Sets: Managerial Knowledge Units in the Frontal Lobes , 2018, Integrating Theory and Practice in Clinical Neuropsychology.

[9]  Judith F. Kroll,et al.  Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions , 1984 .

[10]  J. Mandler.  Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory , 1984 .

[11]  J. Duncan.  Disorganisation of behaviour after frontal lobe damage , 1986 .

[12]  A. Damasio,et al.  Severe disturbance of higher cognition after bilateral frontal lobe ablation , 1985, Neurology.

[13]  T. Shallice.  From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure: Converging Operations: Specific Syndromes and Evidence from Normal Subjects , 1988 .

[14]  John B. Black,et al.  The representation of scripts in memory , 1985 .

[15]  Herbert Weingartner,et al.  Script generation as an indicator of knowledge representation in patients with Alzheimer's disease , 1991, Brain and Language.

[16]  D. Stuss,et al.  Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  C SchankRoger,et al.  Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People , 1983 .

[19]  A. Luria.  Higher Cortical Functions in Man , 1980, Springer US.

[20]  Michael W. Montgomery,et al.  Cognitive theory and the study of everyday action disorders after brain damage , 1993 .

[21]  James A. Hendler,et al.  Damage to the prefrontal cortex leads to decomposition of structured event complexes , 1993 .

[22]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[23]  H. Damasio,et al.  A computed tomographic guide to the identification of cerebral vascular territories. , 1983, Archives of neurology.