Regional Multiplier Analysis: A Demometric Approach

This paper reports on the design and testing of an adequate framework for conducting regional multiplier studies in areas experiencing rapid population growth. It puts forward the demometric approach, one that applies econometric methods to the analysis of demoeconomic growth. Two alternative models are proposed here. The first is an aggregate model presenting a demometric revision of the traditional economic-base model. The second model, an enlarged version of the first, is characterized by a breakdown of economic activities into nine major sectors. Both models are fitted to data for the rapidly growing metropolitan area of Tucson, Arizona, USA. They are then used to derive tentative impact and dynamic multipliers which substantiate the role of households as consumers and suppliers of labor in the development of the Tucson Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). The major finding is that, for the same level of resources, the second model yields better policy implications than the modified (and therefore also than the traditional) economic-base model.

[1]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Impact Multipliers and Dynamic Properties of the Klein-Goldberger Model. , 1961 .

[2]  L. Olvey Regional Growth and Interregional Migration - Their Pattern of Interaction , 1972 .

[3]  J. Miron Job Search, Migration, and Metropolitan Growth , 1977 .

[4]  Jerome L. Stein,et al.  Economic Growth in a Free Market. , 1965 .

[5]  On the relationship of childhood to labor force migration rates , 1977 .

[6]  Nathan Keyfitz,et al.  Understanding world models , 1978 .

[7]  Two Methodological Notes on Spatial Population Dynamics in the Soviet Union , 1976 .

[8]  Andrei Rogers,et al.  Model Migration Schedules and Their Applications , 1978 .

[9]  Y Evtushenko,et al.  Nonlinear Programming Approaches to National Settlement System Planning , 1976 .

[10]  A. G. Wilson,et al.  Patterns and processes in urban and regional systems , 1972 .

[11]  M. Greenwood Urban Economic Growth and Migration: Their Interaction , 1973 .

[12]  J. Miron Job-Search Perspectives on Migration Behaviour , 1978 .

[13]  A. Rogers Migration, urbanization, resources and development. , 1977, Ekistics; reviews on the problems and science of human settlements.

[14]  Warren F. Mazek,et al.  The Chicken or Egg Fowl-up in Migration: Comment , 1972 .

[15]  F. Willekens The recovery of detailed migration patterns from aggregate data: an entropy maximizing approach , 1977 .

[16]  A. I. Propoi,et al.  A Dynamic Linear Programming Approach to National Settlement System Planning , 1977 .

[17]  A. Rogers,et al.  The Spatial Reproductive Value and the Spatial Momentum of Zero Population Growth , 1978 .

[18]  Andrei Rogers,et al.  More Computer Programs for Spatial Demographic Analysis , 1977 .

[19]  Optimization of Rural—Urban Development and Migration , 1978 .

[20]  R. Muth Migration: Chicken or Egg? , 1971 .

[21]  Andrei Rogers,et al.  Demometrics of Migration and Settlement , 1976 .

[22]  S. Czamanski A MODEL OF URBAN GROWTH , 1964 .

[23]  F. Willekens The Spatial Reproductive Value: Theory and Applications , 1977 .

[24]  A. Rogers The Comparative Migration and Settlement Study: A Summary of Workshop Proceedings and Conclusions , 1976 .

[25]  R. Mehra An optimal control approach to national settlement system planning , 1976, 1976 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 15th Symposium on Adaptive Processes.