The Role of Perceived Risk and Security Level in Building Trust in E-government Solutions

[1]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[2]  Michaela Koller Risk as a Determinant of Trust , 1988 .

[3]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[6]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  David Gefen,et al.  Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers , 2002, Data Base.

[8]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Encouraging Citizen Adoption of eGovernment by Building Trust , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[9]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[10]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Consumer-perceived risk in e-commerce transactions , 2003, CACM.

[11]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[12]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trust and Risk in eGovernment Adoption , 2008, AMCIS.

[15]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  Converting Web Site Visitors into Buyers: How Web Site Investment Increases Consumer Trusting Beliefs and Online Purchase Intentions , 2006 .

[16]  Susan K. Lippert,et al.  A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behavior , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Factors for Successful e‑Government Adoption: a Conceptual Framework , 2007 .

[18]  S. Rotchanakitumnuai The Important Risk Factors of E-Government Service Adoption , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[19]  Margôt Kuttschreuter,et al.  Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  Xin Li,et al.  Why do we trust new technology? A study of initial trust formation with organizational information systems , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[22]  Guy Paré,et al.  Determinants of Internet use as a preferred source of information on personal health , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[23]  Su-Chao Chang,et al.  An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[24]  Lei da Chen,et al.  A model of consumer acceptance of mobile payment , 2008, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[25]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[26]  Zbigniew Wisniewski,et al.  HCI Standards for Handicapped , 2009, HCI.

[27]  S. Colesca Understanding Trust in e-Government , 2009 .

[28]  Zbigniew Wisniewski,et al.  The Analysis and Assessment of Adjustment of Selected Web Sites and Web Browsers to the Needs of People with Disabilities , 2009, HCI.

[29]  Yudi Fernando,et al.  Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[30]  Thomas Hess,et al.  The Signaling Role of IT Features in Influencing Trust and Participation in Online Communities , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[31]  A. Rutkauskas,et al.  Peculiarities of Risk Concept formation/Rizikos Sampratos Formavimosi Ypatumai , 2011 .

[32]  Nancy K. Lankton,et al.  What does it mean to trust facebook?: examining technology and interpersonal trust beliefs , 2011, DATB.

[33]  S. Kowalski,et al.  Secure e-Government Adoption: A Case Study of Tanzania , 2011 .

[34]  Blanca Hernández-Ortega The role of post-use trust in the acceptance of a technology: Drivers and consequences , 2011 .

[35]  Ivan K. W. Lai,et al.  Trust factors influencing the adoption of internet-based interorganizational systems , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[36]  G. Maiga,et al.  An information security model for e-government services adoption in Uganda , 2013, 2013 IST-Africa Conference & Exhibition.

[37]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  E-GOVERNMENT ACCEPTANCE FACTORS: TRUST AND RISK , 2013 .

[38]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[39]  Seunghwan Myeong,et al.  Sustainable E-Governance: The Relationship among Trust, Digital Divide, and E-Government , 2014 .

[40]  David C. Yen,et al.  Factors affecting online tax filing - An application of the IS Success Model and trust theory , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Kjell Jørgen Hole,et al.  Building Trust in E-Government Services , 2016, Computer.

[42]  Mirko Dohnal,et al.  Formalized Qualitative Modeling of Online Trust: Introduction of the Method and a Detailed Example , 2016 .

[43]  J. Ejdys PROSPECTIVE QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF NURSING HOME CARE SERVICES , 2016 .

[44]  Joanicjusz Nazarko,et al.  Future Trends in Road Pavement Technologies Development in the Context of Environmental Protection , 2016 .

[45]  Łukasz Nazarko Responsible Research and Innovation - A New Paradigm of Technology Management , 2016 .

[46]  H M B P Ranaweera,et al.  Perspective of trust towards e-government initiatives in Sri Lanka , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[47]  Eva Söderström,et al.  Managing healthcare information: analyzing trust. , 2016, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[48]  Natasha C. H. L. Mazey,et al.  Perceptions of trust in bionano sensors: Is it against our better judgement? An investigation of generalised expectancies and the emerging technology trust paradox , 2017, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[49]  Mohammad Asif Salam The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between technology, trust and operational performance , 2017 .

[50]  Jon Reiersen Trust as a booster , 2017 .

[51]  Mohamad Aizi Salamat,et al.  Modelling End-User of Electronic-Government Service: The Role of Information quality, System Quality and Trust , 2017 .

[52]  Murathan Kurfali,et al.  Adoption of e-government services in Turkey , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[53]  J. Nazarko,et al.  Environmental DEA method for assessing productivity of European countries , 2017 .

[54]  Łukasz Nazarko,et al.  Future-Oriented Technology Assessment☆ , 2017 .

[55]  Joanicjusz Nazarko,et al.  Application of Enhanced SWOT Analysis in the Future-oriented Public Management of Technology , 2017 .

[56]  Shareeful Islam,et al.  E-Government Maturity Model for Sustainable E-Government Services from the Perspective of Developing Countries , 2018, Sustainability.

[57]  Kanwaldeep Kaur,et al.  Trust in driverless cars: Investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars , 2018 .

[58]  J. Ejdys,et al.  Sustainable Adaptation of New Technology — The Case of Humanoids Used for the Care of Older Adults , 2018 .

[59]  Anita Derecskei Relations between risk attitudes, culture and the endowment effect , 2018, Engineering Management in Production and Services.

[60]  Silas Formunyuy Verkijika,et al.  E-government adoption in sub-Saharan Africa , 2018, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[61]  Dan J. Kim,et al.  A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents , 2019 .