Challenges in integrating health and social care: the Better Care Fund in England

Objectives The Better Care Fund is the first and only national policy in England that has legally mandated the use of pooled budgets to support local health and social care systems to provide better integrated care. Methods We report qualitative findings from the first national multi-method evaluation of the Better Care Fund, focusing on its implementation, perceptions of progress and expected impacts among key stakeholders. Interviews were carried out with 40 staff responsible for Better Care Fund implementation in 16 local health and social care sites between 2017 and 2018. Results Study participants reported their experiences of implementation, and we present these in relation to three themes: organizational issues, relational issues and wider contextual issues. Participants stressed the practical and political challenges of managing pooled budgets and the complexity of working across geographical boundaries. In a context of unprecedented austerity, shared vision and strong leadership were even more vital to achieve collaborative outcomes. Conclusion Pooling budgets through the Better Care Fund can lever closer collaboration between sectors and services. Shared vision and leadership are essential to develop and foster this closer collaboration. Although some successes were reported, the study highlights that there are major cultural, operational and territorial barriers to overcome.

[1]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  A system-level evaluation of the Better Care Fund: Final Report , 2018 .

[2]  K. Checkland,et al.  Enacting localist health policy in the English NHS: the ‘governing assemblage’ of Clinical Commissioning Groups , 2018, Journal of health services research & policy.

[3]  N. Mays,et al.  The spatial politics of place and health policy: Exploring Sustainability and Transformation Plans in the English NHS. , 2017, Social science & medicine.

[4]  N. Mays,et al.  Early findings from the evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers in England , 2017 .

[5]  E. Nolte Financing and Reimbursement , 2017 .

[6]  Ezra Dessers,et al.  Instruments Measuring Integrated Care: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. , 2016, The Milbank quarterly.

[7]  A. Mason,et al.  Integrated Care: A Pill for All Ills? , 2016, International journal of health policy and management.

[8]  R. Humphries Integrated health and social care in England--Progress and prospects. , 2015, Health policy.

[9]  M. Chalkley,et al.  Integrating funds for health and social care: an evidence review , 2014, Journal of health services research & policy.

[10]  R. Busse,et al.  Integrated care experiences and outcomes in Germany, the Netherlands, and England. , 2014, Health affairs.

[11]  Ailsa Cameron,et al.  Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services: a review of research literature. , 2014, Health & social care in the community.

[12]  M. Roland,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to integrating care: experiences from the English Integrated Care Pilots , 2012, International journal of integrated care.

[13]  P. Allebeck,et al.  Using pooled budgets to integrate health and welfare services: a comparison of experiments in England and Sweden. , 2005, Health & social care in the community.

[14]  Caroline Glendinning,et al.  Breaking down barriers: integrating health and care services for older people in England. , 2003, Health policy.

[15]  J. Lewis Older People and the Health-Social Care Boundary in the UK: Half a Century of Hidden Policy Conflict , 2001 .