论文信息 - A reply - 字舞流文

A reply

I . GROUNDS RM, MOORE M, MORGAN M. The relative potencies of thiopentone and propofol. European Journal of’ Anuesrhesiolugy 1986; 3: 11-17. 2. DUNDEE JW, ROBINSON FP, MCCOLLUM JSC, PA~TERSON CC. Sensitivity to prupofol in the elderly. Anuesthesia 1986: 41: 482-5. 3. D U N D E ~ JW, HASSARD TH, MCGOWAN WAW. HENSHAW J. The ‘induction’ dose of thiopentone. A method of study and preliminary illustrative results. Anaesthesia 1982; 37: I 176-84. 4. SELTZER JL, GERWN J1. ALLEN FB. Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of bolus v. incremental administration of thiopentone. Brirish Journal ofAnaesthesia 1980; 52: 521 30.

R. Grounds | M. Morgan | M. Taylor

[1] L. Versichelen,et al. Effect of speed of injection on induction of anaesthesia using propofol. , 1985, British journal of anaesthesia.

[2] G C Cummings,et al. Dose requirements of ICI 35,868 (Propofol, ‘Diprivan’) in a new formulation for induction of anaesthesia , 1983, Anaesthesia.

[3] F. B. Allen,et al. Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of bolus v. incremental administration of thiopentone. , 1980, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4] G. Torri,et al. The relative potencies of thiopentone, ketamine, propanidid, alphaxalone and diazepam. A statistical study in man. , 1979, British journal of anaesthesia.