Cesarean delivery rates and indications in pregnancies complicated by diabetes

Abstract Objective Rates of pregestational (PGDM) and gestational diabetes (GDM), and their associated pregnancy complications, are rising. Pregnancies complicated by diabetes have increased cesarean delivery (CD) rates; however, there are limited data regarding the current rates of, and contributing factors to, these deliveries. The Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) is a clinically relevant, standardized framework that can be used to evaluate and analyze cesarean rates. The objective of this study was to evaluate rates of, and indications for, intrapartum, unplanned CD among pregnancies complicated by diabetes, compared to normoglycemic (NG) pregnancies, in a large United States birth cohort. Methods This retrospective cohort study used chart-abstracted data on births between 24 and 42 weeks’ gestation at 17 hospitals that contributed to the Obstetrical Care Outcome Assessment Program database between 01/2016 and 03/2019. The CD rate for NG pregnancies, and pregnancies complicated by gestational and PGDM was calculated and compared using the Robson TGCS. The indications for intrapartum CD in patients with term, singleton, vertex gestations without a prior cesarean were then analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare the cesarean rate and indications for CD, between the diabetic groups and the NG group. Results were adjusted for maternal age, BMI, neonatal birth weight, and insurance status, as well as clustering by hospital. Results A total of 86,381 pregnant people were included in the study cohort. Of these 76,272 (88.3%) were NG, 8591 (9.9%) had GDM, and 1518 (1.8%) had PGDM. Compared to NG patients, overall cesarean rates were higher in patients with GDM (40.3% vs. 29.7%; aOR 1.25, 95%CI 1.18–1.31) and PGDM (60.0% vs. 29.7%; aOR 2.53, 95%CI 2.04–3.13). This finding remained true when the cohort was restricted to term, singleton, vertex laboring patients without a prior cesarean; compared to NG patients, the cesarean rate was higher in patients with GDM (17.4% vs. 12.2%, aOR 1.37, 95%CI 1.29–1.45) and PGDM (26.0% vs. 12.2%, aOR 2.55, 95%CI 2.00–3.25). The cesarean rate for fetal indications was similar in the GDM (5.7%) and NG (4.4%) groups, while those patients with PGDM had a significantly higher rate (10.4%; aOR 2.01, 95%CI 1.43–2.83). Similarly, the rate of cesarean for labor dystocia in patients with PGDM was significantly higher than in NG patients (16.9% vs. 7.0%, and aOR 2.28, 95%CI 1.66–3.13) while patients with GDM had an intermediate rate (10.6% vs. 7.0%, aOR 1.49, 95%CI 1.40–1.57). Conclusions The CD rate is significantly higher in pregnancies complicated by diabetes, particularly pregestational, compared to NG pregnancies. Despite controlling for maternal factors and birth weight, pregnancies complicated by diabetes are more likely to undergo an unplanned intrapartum cesarean secondary to labor dystocia than their NG counterparts, but only pregnancies complicated by PGDM have an increased risk of cesarean for fetal indications. More research is needed to understand whether this higher cesarean rate is due to factors intrinsic to diabetes in laboring patients or is due to a difference in the way clinicians manage diabetics in labor.

[1]  A. Peaceman,et al.  High-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Oxytocin Regimens to Augment Labor in Nulliparous Women , 2021, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: Final Data for 2019. , 2021, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[3]  E. Schleußner,et al.  Influence of high glucose in the expression of miRNAs and IGF1R signaling pathway in human myometrial explants , 2021, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[4]  M. Hatunic,et al.  Pre-Gestational Diabetes and Pregnancy Outcomes , 2020, Diabetes Therapy.

[5]  R. d'Emmanuele di Villa Bianca,et al.  Uterine Dysfunction in Diabetic Mice: The Role of Hydrogen Sulfide , 2020, Antioxidants.

[6]  S. Wild,et al.  Factors associated with stillbirth in women with diabetes , 2019, Diabetologia.

[7]  M. Robson.  The 10-Group Classification System-a new way of thinking. , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  W. H. Pearse,et al.  American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists , 2018, Definitions.

[9]  W. Grobman,et al.  Association between Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight and the Risk of Cesarean Delivery among Nulliparous Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy , 2018, American Journal of Perinatology.

[10]  C. Homer,et al.  Cesarean section and diabetes during pregnancy: An NSW population study using the Robson classification , 2018, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[11]  E. Miller,et al.  Association Between Type of Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Cesarean Delivery. , 2017, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  D. Wing,et al.  Diabetes mellitus: an independent predictor of duration of prostaglandin labor induction , 2017, Journal of Perinatology.

[13]  M. Robson,et al.  413: Classification of intrapartum cesarean delivery: a starting point for more detailed analysis , 2017 .

[14]  V. Souter,et al.  Cervical Dilation on Admission in Term Spontaneous Labor and Maternal and Newborn Outcomes , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  W. Herman,et al.  Preventable health and cost burden of adverse birth outcomes associated with pregestational diabetes in the United States. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  G. Inocêncio,et al.  Which Factors Influence the Type of Delivery and Cesarean Section Rate in Women with Gestational Diabetes? , 2015, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[17]  M. Robson,et al.  Quality assurance: The 10‐Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery , 2015, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[18]  G. Macones,et al.  Factors associated with higher oxytocin requirements in labor , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[19]  U. Reddy,et al.  Stillbirth in the Pregnancy Complicated by Diabetes , 2015, Current Diabetes Reports.

[20]  K. Leveno,et al.  A Revised Birth Weight Reference for the United States , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  L. Poston,et al.  Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  S. Kenyon,et al.  Standard‐ or high‐dose oxytocin for nulliparous women with confirmed delay in labour: quantitative and qualitative results from a pilot randomised controlled trial , 2013, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[23]  S. Wray,et al.  Diabetes is associated with impairment of uterine contractility and high Caesarean section rate , 2011, Diabetologia.

[24]  I. Fajardy,et al.  Consequences of gestational and pregestational diabetes on placental function and birth weight. , 2011, World journal of diabetes.

[25]  Z. Fortes,et al.  Effects of long‐term diabetes on the structure and cell proliferation of the myometrium in the early pregnancy of mice , 2010, International journal of experimental pathology.

[26]  S. Ratcliffe,et al.  Pregestational Diabetes: A Risk Factor for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section Failure? , 2009, American journal of perinatology.

[27]  Sigridur Sia Jonsdottir,et al.  Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes , 2009 .

[28]  L. Leach,et al.  Vascular dysfunction in the diabetic placenta: causes and consequences , 2009, Journal of anatomy.

[29]  A. Fink,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  J. Hiller,et al.  Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  O. Langer,et al.  Overweight and obese in gestational diabetes: the impact on pregnancy outcome. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  P. Catalano,et al.  The influence of obesity and diabetes on the risk of cesarean delivery. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  S. Kjos,et al.  Independent predictors of Cesarean delivery in women with diabetes , 2004, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[34]  H. Wolfe,et al.  Vaginal birth after cesarean in the diabetic gravida. , 2000, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[35]  G. Fulcher,et al.  Outcome of pregnancies complicated by pre‐gestational diabetes mellitus , 2000, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[36]  S. Blackwell,et al.  Why are cesarean delivery rates so high in diabetic pregnancies? , 2000, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[37]  J. Lack,et al.  Classification of Caesarean sections , 1996, Anaesthesia.

[38]  C. Naylor,et al.  Cesarean delivery in relation to birth weight and gestational glucose tolerance: pathophysiology or practice style? Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Investigators. , 1996, JAMA.

[39]  B. Abrams,et al.  Obstetric Complications With GDM: Effects of Maternal Weight , 1991, Diabetes.

[40]  S. Gabbe,et al.  Management and outcome of pregnancy in diabetes mellitus, classes B to R. , 1977, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.