Determination of dioxins (PCDDs/PCDFs) and PCBs in food and feed using the DR CALUX® bioassay: Results of an international validation study

Maximum levels for dioxins in food and feedstuffs have been recently established by the European Commission through two regulations. Dioxin-monitoring programmes of food and feedstuffs will therefore be undertaken by the European Member States to implement these regulations, which would be facilitated by fast and low-cost screening methods. Commission Directives 2002/70/EC and 2002/69/EC describe specific characteristics for such screening methods. In the present study, the performance characteristics of the DR CALUX® method from BioDetection Systems were established in a validation study with 14 participants. The study was based on two materials (fish oil and feed), each containing four different levels of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs around the current limits. The results demonstrate that the test is very promising but that in particular the clean-up procedure was a source of variation and requires further optimization and standardization. In addition the quantification is improved by the use of control samples to correct for background contamination, recovery and differences between the TEF values and REP (relative potency) factors in the test.

[1]  Greet Schoeters,et al.  The evaluation of dioxin and dioxin-like contaminants in selected food samples obtained from the Belgian market: comparison of TEQ measurements obtained through the CALUX bioassay with congener specific chemical analyses. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[2]  L. Goeyens,et al.  The international validation of bio- and chemical-analytical screening methods for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs: the DIFFERENCE project rounds 1 and 2. , 2004, Talanta.

[3]  W. Horwitz,et al.  Protocol for the design, conduct and interpretation of method-performance studies: Revised 1994 (Technical Report) , 1995 .

[4]  Safe,et al.  Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Joris Van Loco,et al.  Importance of REP values when comparing the CALUX bioassay results with chemoanalyses results Example with spiked vegetable oils. , 2004, Talanta.

[6]  W. Traag,et al.  The German bakery waste incident; use of a combined approach of screening and confirmation for dioxins in feed and food. , 2004, Talanta.

[7]  R. Hoogenboom.  The combined use of the CALUX Bioassay and the HRGC/HRMS method for the detection of novel dioxin sources and new dioxin-like compounds , 2002, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[8]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Validation and use of the CALUX-bioassay for the determination of dioxins and PCBs in bovine milk. , 1998, Food additives and contaminants.

[9]  A M Vinggaard,et al.  Applicability of the CALUX bioassay for screening of dioxin levels in human milk samples , 2003, Food additives and contaminants.

[10]  L. Hoogenboom.  Bioassays in contaminant analysis , 2001 .

[11]  G. Clark,et al.  Recombinant cell bioassay systems for the detection and relative quantitation of halogenated dioxins and related chemicals. , 2004, Talanta.

[12]  Shin-ichi Sakai,et al.  Brominated dioxin-like compounds: in vitro assessment in comparison to classical dioxin-like compounds and other polyaromatic compounds. , 2003, Environment international.

[13]  E. De Pauw,et al.  DR-CALUX((R)) screening of food samples: evaluation of the quantitative approach to measure dioxin, furans and dioxin-like PCBs. , 2004, Talanta.