On an Extension of Condition Number Theory to Nonconic Convex Optimization

The purpose of this paper is to extend, as much as possible, the modern theory of condition numbers for conic convex optimization:z *? min x c t x, s.t.Ax-b ? C Y ,x ? C X ,to the more general nonconic format:z *? min x c tx, ( GP d ) s.t.Ax - b ? C Y ,x ? P,whereP is any closed convex set, not necessarily a cone, which we call the ground-set. Although any convex problem can be transformed to conic form, such transformations are neither unique nor natural given the natural description of many problems, thereby diminishing the relevance of data-based condition number theory. Herein we extend the modern theory of condition numbers to the problem format ( GP d ). As a byproduct, we are able to state and prove natural extensions of many theorems from the conic-based theory of condition numbers to this broader problem format.

[1]  Robert M. Freund,et al.  Opera Tions Research Center Working Paper Condition-measure Bounds on the Behavior of the Central Trajectory of a Semi-definite Program , 2022 .

[2]  丸山 徹 Convex Analysisの二,三の進展について , 1977 .

[3]  Fernando Ordóñez,et al.  On the explanatory value of condition numbers for convex optimization : theoretical issues and computational experience , 2002 .

[4]  Robert M. Freund,et al.  A New Condition Measure, Preconditioners, and Relations Between Different Measures of Conditioning for Conic Linear Systems , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[5]  Sharon Filipowski,et al.  On the Complexity of Solving Feasible Linear Programs Specified with Approximate Data , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[6]  Fernando Ordonez,et al.  On an Extension of Condition Number Theory to Non-Conic Convex Optimization , 2003 .

[7]  Felipe Cucker,et al.  A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Solving Polyhedral Conic Systems with a Finite-Precision Machine , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[8]  Fernando Ordóñez,et al.  Computational Experience and the Explanatory Value of Condition Measures for Linear Optimization , 2003, SIAM J. Optim..

[9]  James Renegar,et al.  Linear programming, complexity theory and elementary functional analysis , 1995, Math. Program..

[10]  J. Renegar Some perturbation theory for linear programming , 1994, Math. Program..

[11]  Sharon Filipowski On the Complexity of Solving Sparse Symmetric Linear Programs Specified with Approximate Data , 1997, Math. Oper. Res..

[12]  Jorge R. Vera,et al.  On the complexity of linear programming under finite precision arithmetic , 1998, Math. Program..

[13]  Jorge R. Vera Ill-Posedness and the Complexity of Deciding Existence of Solutions to Linear Programs , 1996, SIAM J. Optim..

[14]  Robert M. Freund,et al.  On the Complexity of Computing Estimates of Condition Measures of a Conic Linear System , 2003, Math. Oper. Res..

[15]  Robert M. Freund,et al.  Condition measures and properties of the central trajectory of a linear program , 1998, Math. Program..

[16]  J. Pe Computing the Distance to Infeasibility: Theoretical and Practical Issues , 1998 .

[17]  Robert M. Freund,et al.  Some characterizations and properties of the “distance to ill-posedness” and the condition measure of a conic linear system , 1999, Math. Program..

[18]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Nonlinear Programming Theory and Algorithms , 2007, Technometrics.

[19]  James Renegar,et al.  Computing approximate solutions for convex conic systems of constraints , 2000, Math. Program..

[20]  Robert M. Freund,et al.  Condition-Based Complexity of Convex Optimization in Conic Linear Form via the Ellipsoid Algorithm , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[21]  Jorge Rafael,et al.  Ill-posedness in mathematical programming and problem-solving with approximate data , 1992 .

[22]  Jean-Louis Goffin,et al.  The Relaxation Method for Solving Systems of Linear Inequalities , 1980, Math. Oper. Res..