Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery.

Since 1989 the New York State Department of Health has published annual data on risk-adjusted mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery by hospital and surgeon. It was the first such program in the nation and is now the most long-lived. Many hospitals were prompted by the data to improve their cardiac surgery programs, and statewide mortality fell substantially as a result. This paper examines what physicians and hospitals did in response to the data, how the market reacted, and whether this approach to quality measurement and improvement could be used more widely.

[1]  D. Fetterolf.  Editorial: Why Do Multi-Organizational Quality Initiatives Usually Fail? , 2002, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[2]  M. Chassin,et al.  Improving the quality of health care: who will lead? , 2001, Health affairs.

[3]  M. Chassin,et al.  Improving quality, minimizing error: making it happen. , 2001, Health affairs.

[4]  A Milstein,et al.  Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[5]  E. Hannan,et al.  The relationship between managed care insurance and use of lower-mortality hospitals for CABG surgery. , 2000, JAMA.

[6]  E. DeLong,et al.  The effects of New York's bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Chassin,et al.  The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  E. Hannan,et al.  Public release of cardiac surgery outcomes data in New York: what do New York state cardiologists think of it? , 1997, American heart journal.

[9]  M. Chassin.  Assessing Strategics For Quality Improvement , 1997 .

[10]  W. Ghali,et al.  Statewide quality improvement initiatives and mortality after cardiac surgery. , 1997, JAMA.

[11]  Russell L. Stogsdill,et al.  A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. , 1996, JAMA.

[12]  E L Hannan,et al.  Benefits and hazards of reporting medical outcomes publicly. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  E J Topol,et al.  Outmigration for coronary bypass surgery in an era of public dissemination of clinical outcomes. , 1996, Circulation.

[14]  R. Brook,et al.  Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes. , 1995, JAMA.

[15]  E. Hannan,et al.  The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. , 1995, JAMA.

[16]  S W Dziuban,et al.  How a New York cardiac surgery program uses outcomes data. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  Virginia Johnston Neelon.  Benefits and Hazards , 1964 .