Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities: a joint R&D project in the French semiconductor industry

Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify dynamic capabilities in joint R&D projects, that enable them to successfully achieve knowledge creation and discover how they behave throughout the life cycle of a collaborative project, although this understanding could enhance the interorganizational knowledge creation process. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted 65 semi-structured interviews and utilized secondary data from a joint R&D project. The authors analyzed all data using the Gioia method. Findings The authors confirm that specific dynamic capabilities are needed to create interorganizational knowledge and discovered 11 knowledge-based dynamic capabilities (KBDCs) for successful innovation results in joint R&D projects. Gioia method allowed to discover that different KBDCs are necessary for the different phases of the project lifecycle. Additionally, the authors identify two microprocesses in which KBDCs are engaged in joint R&D projects, knowing that is a part of the sensing and seizing processes and synthetizing that is a part of the seizing process, and establish several KBDC microfoundations. Research limitations/implications We used retrospective interviews. This kind of interviews are impacted by the experiences of the respondents lived after they have participated in the joint R&D project. Practical implications Dynamic capabilities for collaborative knowledge creation and their specific microfoundations can help managers delineate their strategic practices and actions to achieve more sustainable, long-lasting results from joint R&D projects. Originality/value The authors improve Teece’s model and propose two microprocesses in which dynamic capabilities are engaged, that emerged in the context of a joint RD therefore, the authors propose a methodological advance that can contribute to future studies. The authors provide an interorganizational perspective on KBDC and a methodological view of the changes in KBDCs required for joint R&D projects.

[1]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[2]  Gianmario Verona,et al.  Unbundling Dynamic Capabilities: an Exploratory Study of Continuous Product Innovation , 2003 .

[3]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Project spirit-a strategic concept , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[4]  Amel Attour,et al.  Approches interactives de l’innovation et gestion des connaissances , 2016 .

[5]  A. Langley,et al.  Templates and Turns in Qualitative Studies of Strategy and Management , 2011 .

[6]  Andreas Riege,et al.  Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  The elephant in the room of Dynamic Capabilities: Bringing two diverging conversations together , 2012 .

[8]  Isabel M. Prieto,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities and Knowledge Management: An Integrative Role for Learning? , 2008 .

[9]  Hiroyuki Okamuro Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics , 2007 .

[10]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[11]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Perspectives on activity theory: Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice , 1999 .

[12]  Raffaele Filieri,et al.  Structural social capital and innovation. Is knowledge transfer the missing link? , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[13]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Unmasking the interplay between technology evolution and R&D collaboration: Evidence from the global semiconductor manufacturing industry, 1990–2010 , 2014 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[15]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Theory of the Knowledge-Creating Firm: Subjectivity, Objectivity and Synthesis , 2005 .

[16]  Stefania Mariano,et al.  The construct of absorptive capacity in knowledge management and intellectual capital research: content and text analyses , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[17]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[18]  Pi-Sheng Deng,et al.  Applying a Market-Based Approach to the Development of a Sharing-Enabled KM Model for Knowledge-Intensive Small Firms , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[19]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[20]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path , 2009 .

[21]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[22]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[23]  Andrés Barge-Gil,et al.  Public selection and financing of R&D cooperative projects: Credit versus subsidy funding , 2010 .

[24]  D. Teece The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms , 2014 .

[25]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Knowledge-based Dynamic Capabilities and Innovation in Networked Environments , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off , 2004 .

[27]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management , 2013 .

[28]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  Five critical knowledge management organizational themes , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[29]  Julían Andrés,et al.  La gestión del conocimiento y su influencia en las capacidades dinámicas: Contrastación empírica en Empresas Colombianas Intensivas en uso de conocimiento , 2020 .

[30]  G. McLean,et al.  Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management , 2010 .

[31]  N. Denzin The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[32]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[33]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Quo Vadis, Dynamic Capabilities? A Content-Analytic Review of the Current State of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Research , 2018 .

[34]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[35]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[36]  Nofal Nagles García Reseña de "Dynamic capabilities. Understanding strategic change in organizations" de Constance E. Helfat, Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margareth Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David J. Teece, Sidney Winter , 2010 .

[37]  Heléne Lundberg,et al.  Cooperation among companies, universities and local government in a Swedish context , 2012 .

[38]  Kristin N. Price,et al.  Forging an Identity: An Insider-outsider Study of Processes Involved in the Formation of Organizational Identity , 2010 .

[39]  Colin C. J. Cheng,et al.  Effects of open innovation and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities on radical innovation , 2016 .

[40]  Mitsuhiro Fukuzawa,et al.  Dynamic Capability as Fashion , 2015 .

[41]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[42]  Jan‐Erik Vahlne,et al.  Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): Case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA , 2017 .

[43]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Expatriate Knowledge Transfer, Subsidiary Absorptive Capacity, and Subsidiary Performance , 2012 .

[44]  Thierry Picq,et al.  Inter-organisational projects in french innovation clusters: the construction of collaboration , 2010 .

[45]  S. Park,et al.  Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure , 2001 .

[46]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth , 2005 .

[47]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – A new paradigm for organizational theory , 2014 .

[48]  Vladan Devedžić,et al.  Content and knowledge provision service – a way to build intellectual capital in learning organizations , 2014 .

[49]  Frank T. Rothaermel,et al.  Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[50]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[51]  Jason P. Davis,et al.  Rotating Leadership and Collaborative Innovation , 2011 .

[52]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[53]  Willy C. Shih,et al.  Radical Collaboration: IBM Microelectronics Joint Development Alliances (TN) , 2008 .

[54]  Kazuhiro Asakawa,et al.  R&D Collaborations and Product Innovation , 2010 .

[55]  Nieves L. Diaz-Diaz,et al.  The interaction between external and internal knowledge sources: an open innovation view , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[56]  S. Kotha,et al.  Knowledge Creation Through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Industry , 2006 .

[57]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[58]  Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez,et al.  Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: A bibliometric analysis , 2018 .

[59]  James S. Denford Building knowledge: developing a knowledge-based dynamic capabilities typology , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[60]  Philip Bromiley,et al.  Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: spare change, everyone? , 2009 .

[61]  Petra A. Nylund,et al.  Innovation as a Knowledge-Based Outcome , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[62]  Paul N. Gooderham,et al.  Enhancing knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: a dynamic capabilities driven model , 2007 .

[63]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[64]  Abdelfattah Triki,et al.  Customer Knowledge Enabled Innovation capability: Proposing a measurement scale , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[65]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis) , 2007 .

[66]  Rıfat Kamaşak,et al.  Knowledge process capabilities and innovation: testing the moderating effects of environmental dynamism and strategic flexibility , 2017 .

[67]  David Ford,et al.  Making sense of network dynamics through network pictures: A longitudinal case study , 2005 .

[68]  Gianluigi Mangia,et al.  Knowledge creation and inter-organizational relationships: the development of innovation in the railway industry , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[69]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective , 2007 .

[70]  Darren Dalcher,et al.  The Dynamics of Collaboration in Multipartner Projects , 2010 .

[71]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[72]  Lilia Maria Vargas,et al.  Knowledge creation in small-firm network , 2008, J. Knowl. Manag..

[73]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[74]  Jeffrey Y. Kim,et al.  Managing knowledge work: specialization and collaboration of engineering problem-solving , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[75]  Mustafa E. Kamasak,et al.  Emotion Recognition via Galvanic Skin Response: Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Feature Extraction Methods , 2017 .

[76]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[77]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[78]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[79]  Stephane Lhuillery,et al.  R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data , 2009 .

[80]  Karen Page,et al.  Network Forms of Organization , 1998 .