Molecular control of macroscopic forces drives formation of the vertebrate hindgut

The embryonic gut tube is a cylindrical structure from which the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts develop1. Although the early emergence of the endoderm as an epithelial sheet2,3 and later morphogenesis of the definitive digestive and respiratory organs4–6 have been investigated, the intervening process of gut tube formation remains relatively understudied7,8. Here we investigate the molecular control of macroscopic forces underlying early morphogenesis of the gut tube in the chick embryo. The gut tube has been described as forming from two endodermal invaginations—the anterior intestinal portal (AIP) towards the rostral end of the embryo and the caudal intestinal portal (CIP) at the caudal end—that migrate towards one another, internalizing the endoderm until they meet at the yolk stalk (umbilicus in mammals)1,6. Migration of the AIP to form foregut has been descriptively characterized8,9, but the hindgut is likely to form by a distinct mechanism that has not been fully explained10. We find that the hindgut is formed by collective cell movements through a stationary CIP, rather than by movement of the CIP itself. Further, combining in vivo imaging, biophysics and mathematical modelling with molecular and embryological approaches, we identify a contractile force gradient that drives cell movements in the hindgut-forming endoderm, enabling tissue-scale posterior extension of the forming hindgut tube. The force gradient, in turn, is established in response to a morphogenic gradient of fibroblast growth factor signalling. As a result, we propose that an important positive feedback arises, whereby contracting cells draw passive cells from low to high fibroblast growth factor levels, recruiting them to contract and pull more cells into the elongating hindgut. In addition to providing insight into the early gut development, these findings illustrate how large-scale tissue level forces can be traced to developmental signals during vertebrate morphogenesis.Cell-labelling experiments are used to demonstrate that the hindgut in the chick embryo is formed by cells moving through the stationary caudal intestinal portal as a result of a contractile force gradient directed by fibroblast growth factor signalling.

[1]  C. Tabin,et al.  Cell Movements at Hensen’s Node Establish Left/Right Asymmetric Gene Expression in the Chick , 2009, Science.

[2]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: experiment and model. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Roberto Mayor,et al.  The front and rear of collective cell migration , 2016, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  R. Huebner,et al.  Mammary epithelial tubes elongate through MAPK-dependent coordination of cell migration , 2016, Development.

[5]  Eric F. Wieschaus,et al.  Integration of contractile forces during tissue invagination , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  M. Kirby,et al.  FGF8 signaling is chemotactic for cardiac neural crest cells. , 2011, Developmental biology.

[7]  M. Lewandoski,et al.  FGF4 and FGF8 comprise the wavefront activity that controls somitogenesis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  H Nogawa,et al.  EGF‐dependent lobule formation and FGF7‐dependent stalk elongation in branching morphogenesis of mouse salivary epithelium in vitro , 1999, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[9]  Cornelis J Weijer,et al.  Cell movement patterns during gastrulation in the chick are controlled by positive and negative chemotaxis mediated by FGF4 and FGF8. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[10]  C. Tabin,et al.  A Somitic Compartment of Tendon Progenitors , 2003, Cell.

[11]  Larry A Taber,et al.  On the effects of residual stress in microindentation tests of soft tissue structures. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  Olivier Pourquié,et al.  fgf8 mRNA decay establishes a gradient that couples axial elongation to patterning in the vertebrate embryo , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Aaron M Zorn,et al.  Vertebrate endoderm development and organ formation. , 2009, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[14]  H. Stalsberg,et al.  Endodermal movements during foregut formation in the chick embryo. , 1968, Developmental biology.

[15]  Guy B. Blanchard,et al.  Mechanical control of global cell behaviour during dorsal closure in Drosophila , 2009, Development.

[16]  V. Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. , 2012, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[17]  G. Steding,et al.  Topogenesis of the anterior intestinal port , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[18]  S. Chapman,et al.  Improved method for chick whole‐embryo culture using a filter paper carrier , 2001, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[19]  L. Taber,et al.  A new hypothesis for foregut and heart tube formation based on differential growth and actomyosin contraction , 2017, Development.

[20]  H. Sang,et al.  Myosin II-mediated cell shape changes and cell intercalation contribute to primitive streak formation , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[21]  NEGotiating Cell Identity through Regulated Cytoplasmic Polyadenylation. , 2015, Developmental cell.

[22]  P. Friedl,et al.  Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[23]  G. Rosenquist The location of the pregut endoderm in the chick embryo at the primitive streak stage as determined by radioautographic mapping. , 1971, Developmental biology.

[24]  Larry A. Taber,et al.  Nonlinear Theory of Elasticity: Applications in Biomechanics , 2004 .

[25]  Richard A. Lang,et al.  Differential Interactions of FGFs with Heparan Sulfate Control Gradient Formation and Branching Morphogenesis , 2009, Science Signaling.

[26]  Lars Hufnagel,et al.  Embryo-scale tissue mechanics during Drosophila gastrulation movements , 2015, Nature Communications.

[27]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Bending Gradients: How the Intestinal Stem Cell Gets Its Home , 2015, Cell.

[28]  Peer Bork,et al.  Luminal signalling links cell communication to tissue architecture during organogenesis , 2014, Nature.

[29]  Shin Ishii,et al.  Collective Cell Migration , 2013 .

[30]  Olivier Pourquié,et al.  FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation , 2001, Cell.

[31]  Christopher J. Staples,et al.  Negative-feedback regulation of FGF signalling by DUSP6/MKP-3 is driven by ERK1/2 and mediated by Ets factor binding to a conserved site within the DUSP6/MKP-3 gene promoter , 2008, The Biochemical journal.

[32]  P. Khoo,et al.  Regionalisation of the endoderm progenitors and morphogenesis of the gut portals of the mouse embryo , 2008, Mechanisms of Development.

[33]  Molly J. Harding,et al.  Fgfr-Ras-MAPK signaling is required for apical constriction via apical positioning of Rho-associated kinase during mechanosensory organ formation , 2012, Development.

[34]  A. Hadjantonakis,et al.  The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[35]  Olivier Pourquié,et al.  Signaling gradients during paraxial mesoderm development. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[36]  C. Tickle,et al.  A positive feedback loop coordinates growth and patterning in the vertebrate limb , 1994, Nature.

[37]  Marten Postma,et al.  mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging , 2016, Nature Methods.

[38]  G. Martin,et al.  Functions of FGF signalling from the apical ectodermal ridge in limb development , 2002, Nature.

[39]  Michael Brand,et al.  Fgf8 morphogen gradient forms by a source-sink mechanism with freely diffusing molecules , 2009, Nature.

[40]  Larry A. Taber,et al.  Pattern Formation in a Nonlinear Membrane Model for Epithelial Morphogenesis , 2000 .

[41]  Scott E. Fraser,et al.  FGF receptor signalling is required to maintain neural progenitors during Hensen's node progression , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[42]  Thomas Lecuit,et al.  Mechanics of Epithelial Tissue Homeostasis and Morphogenesis , 2013, Science.

[43]  M. Capecchi,et al.  Signaling by FGF4 and FGF8 is required for axial elongation of the mouse embryo. , 2012, Developmental biology.

[44]  R. Ladher,et al.  FGF Signaling Regulates Cytoskeletal Remodeling during Epithelial Morphogenesis , 2008, Current Biology.

[45]  Victor D. Varner,et al.  Mechanics of head fold formation: investigating tissue-level forces during early development , 2010, Development.

[46]  E. Fuchs,et al.  Forces generated by cell intercalation tow epidermal sheets in mammalian tissue morphogenesis. , 2014, Developmental cell.

[47]  D. Gilmour,et al.  Dynamic Fgf signaling couples morphogenesis and migration in the zebrafish lateral line primordium , 2008, Development.

[48]  C. Marcelle,et al.  The timing of emergence of muscle progenitors is controlled by an FGF/ERK/SNAIL1 pathway. , 2009, Developmental biology.

[49]  K. A. Lurie,et al.  Nonlinear Theory of Elasticity , 2012 .

[50]  M. Krasnow,et al.  branchless Encodes a Drosophila FGF Homolog That Controls Tracheal Cell Migration and the Pattern of Branching , 1996, Cell.

[51]  L. Mahadevan,et al.  Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation , 2009, Nature Methods.

[52]  Lance A Davidson,et al.  Mechanics of blastopore closure during amphibian gastrulation. , 2015, Developmental biology.

[53]  L. Wolpert,et al.  The amniote primitive streak is defined by epithelial cell intercalation before gastrulation , 2007, Nature.

[54]  S. Matsushita Fate mapping study of the endoderm in the posterior part of the 1.5‐day‐old chick embryo , 1999, Development, growth & differentiation.

[55]  Ray Keller,et al.  Cell migration during gastrulation. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[56]  Yoshiko Takahashi,et al.  FGF8 coordinates tissue elongation and cell epithelialization during early kidney tubulogenesis , 2015, Development.

[57]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[58]  O. Ronneberger,et al.  Shroom3 is required downstream of FGF signalling to mediate proneuromast assembly in zebrafish , 2012, Development.

[59]  Melinda Larsen,et al.  FGFR2b signaling regulates ex vivo submandibular gland epithelial cell proliferation and branching morphogenesis , 2005, Development.

[60]  R. Pedersen,et al.  Cell fate and cell lineage in the endoderm of the presomite mouse embryo, studied with an intracellular tracer. , 1986, Developmental biology.

[61]  Dmitriy M Chudakov,et al.  Conversion of red fluorescent protein into a bright blue probe. , 2008, Chemistry & biology.

[62]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Friction forces position the neural anlage , 2017, Nature Cell Biology.

[63]  Victor D. Varner,et al.  Localized Smooth Muscle Differentiation Is Essential for Epithelial Bifurcation during Branching Morphogenesis of the Mammalian Lung. , 2015, Developmental cell.

[64]  W. Nelson,et al.  Cadherins in development: cell adhesion, sorting, and tissue morphogenesis. , 2006, Genes & development.

[65]  C. Cepko,et al.  Identification of a retina-specific Otx2 enhancer element active in immature developing photoreceptors. , 2011, Developmental biology.

[66]  Jörn Dunkel,et al.  Actomyosin-based tissue folding requires a multicellular myosin gradient , 2017, Development.

[67]  Charles D. Little,et al.  A random cell motility gradient downstream of FGF controls elongation of an amniote embryo , 2009, Nature.