Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG.

Different brain imaging devices are presently available to provide images of the human functional cortical activity, based on hemodynamic, metabolic or electromagnetic measurements. However, static images of brain regions activated during particular tasks do not convey the information of how these regions are interconnected. The concept of brain connectivity plays a central role in the neuroscience, and different definitions of connectivity, functional and effective, have been adopted in literature. While the functional connectivity is defined as the temporal coherence among the activities of different brain areas, the effective connectivity is defined as the simplest brain circuit that would produce the same temporal relationship as observed experimentally among cortical sites. The structural equation modeling (SEM) is the most used method to estimate effective connectivity in neuroscience, and its typical application is on data related to brain hemodynamic behavior tested by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), whereas the directed transfer function (DTF) method is a frequency-domain approach based on both a multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) modeling of time series and on the concept of Granger causality. This study presents advanced methods for the estimation of cortical connectivity by applying SEM and DTF on the cortical signals estimated from high-resolution electroencephalography (EEG) recordings, since these signals exhibit a higher spatial resolution than conventional cerebral electromagnetic measures. To estimate correctly the cortical signals, we used a subject's multicompartment head model (scalp, skull, dura mater, cortex) constructed from individual MRI, a distributed source model and a regularized linear inverse source estimates of cortical current density. Before the application of SEM and DTF methodology to the cortical waveforms estimated from high-resolution EEG data, we performed a simulation study, in which different main factors (signal-to-noise ratio, SNR, and simulated cortical activity duration, LENGTH) were systematically manipulated in the generation of test signals, and the errors in the estimated connectivity were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA). The statistical analysis returned that during simulations, both SEM and DTF estimators were able to correctly estimate the imposed connectivity patterns under reasonable operative conditions, that is, when data exhibit an SNR of at least 3 and a LENGTH of at least 75 s of nonconsecutive EEG recordings at 64 Hz of sampling rate. Hence, effective and functional connectivity patterns of cortical activity can be effectively estimated under general conditions met in any practical EEG recordings, by combining high-resolution EEG techniques and linear inverse estimation with SEM or DTF methods. We conclude that the estimation of cortical connectivity can be performed not only with hemodynamic measurements, but also with EEG signals treated with advanced computational techniques.

[1]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Measurement of interhemispheric time differences in generalised spike-and-wave. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  P. Rossini,et al.  Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: A simulation study with variable signal‐to‐noise ratio and number of sensors , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[3]  A. E. Schulman,et al.  Functional coupling and regional activation of human cortical motor areas during simple, internally paced and externally paced finger movements. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Andrea Brovelli,et al.  Medium-Range Oscillatory Network and the 20-Hz Sensorimotor Induced Potential , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  R Quian Quiroga,et al.  Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: a case study on electroencephalographic signals. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  C. Uhl Analysis of neurophysiological brain functioning , 1999 .

[7]  S. G. Andino,et al.  Distributed Source Models: Standard Solutions and New Developments , 1999 .

[8]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Cortical activations during paced finger-tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[10]  C. Stam,et al.  Nonlinear synchronization in EEG and whole‐head MEG recordings of healthy subjects , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[11]  P. Rossini,et al.  High-resolution electro-encephalogram: source estimates of Laplacian-transformed somatosensory-evoked potentials using a realistic subject head model constructed from magnetic resonance images , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  K. Sekihara,et al.  Generalized Wiener estimation of three-dimensional current distribution from biomagnetic measurements , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Arthur K. Liu,et al.  Spatiotemporal brain imaging , 2000 .

[14]  Jie Lian,et al.  An equivalent current source model and Laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  C. Stam,et al.  Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets , 2002 .

[16]  E Donchin,et al.  A cortical potential imaging analysis of the P300 and Novelty P3 components , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Febo Cincotti,et al.  Multimodal integration of high-resolution EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging data: a simulation study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  Peter Stoeter,et al.  Altered effective connectivity during working memory performance in schizophrenia: a study with fMRI and structural equation modeling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  Bart W. Stuck,et al.  A Computer and Communication Network Performance Analysis Primer (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1985; revised, 1987) , 1987, Int. CMG Conference.

[20]  K Shinosaki,et al.  Inter-site EEG relationships before widespread epileptiform discharges. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[21]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  The elusive concept of brain connectivity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[22]  F Babiloni,et al.  Computerized processing of EEG-EOG-EMG artifacts for multi-centric studies in EEG oscillations and event-related potentials. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  B. Day,et al.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp , 1991, Experimental physiology.

[24]  J Gross,et al.  REPRINTS , 1962, The Lancet.

[25]  G. Carter Coherence and time delay estimation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[26]  S. Bressler Large-scale cortical networks and cognition , 1995, Brain Research Reviews.

[27]  G. Edelman,et al.  A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Dynamics of the human alpha rhythm: evidence for non-linearity? , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[30]  P. Hansen Numerical tools for analysis and solution of Fredholm integral equations of the first kind , 1992 .

[31]  A. Urbano,et al.  Dynamic functional coupling of high resolution EEG potentials related to unilateral internally triggered one-digit movements. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  C. Granger Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[33]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  B. He,et al.  High-resolution spatio-temporal functional neuroimaging of brain activity. , 2002, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[35]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  J Gross,et al.  Properties of MEG tomographic maps obtained with spatial filtering , 2003, NeuroImage.

[38]  Bin He,et al.  Boundary Element Method-Based Cortical Potential Imaging of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials Using Subjects' Magnetic Resonance Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[39]  S. Bressler,et al.  Event-related covariances during a bimanual visuomotor task. II. Preparation and feedback. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[40]  Steven Kay,et al.  Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application , 1988 .

[41]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[42]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[43]  M. Roulston Estimating the errors on measured entropy and mutual information , 1999 .

[44]  Norihiko Fujita,et al.  Movement-Related Desynchronization of the Cerebral Cortex Studied with Spatially Filtered Magnetoencephalography , 2000, NeuroImage.

[45]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[46]  W. M. Carey,et al.  Digital spectral analysis: with applications , 1986 .

[47]  P. Nunez,et al.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995 .

[48]  M. Hallett,et al.  Integrative visuomotor behavior is associated with interregionally coherent oscillations in the human brain. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Jie Lian,et al.  High-resolution EEG: on the cortical equivalent dipole layer imaging , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[50]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[51]  John W Belliveau,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[52]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[53]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[54]  Andrea Mechelli,et al.  A report of the functional connectivity workshop, Dusseldorf 2002 , 2003, NeuroImage.

[55]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .