Optimal Resource Allocation in Ground Wireless Networks Supporting Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Transmissions

We consider a fully-loaded ground wireless network supporting unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) transmission services. To enable the overload transmissions to a ground user (GU) and a UAV, two transmission schemes are employed, namely non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and relaying, depending on whether or not the GU and UAV are served simultaneously. Under the assumption of the system operating with infinite blocklength (IBL) codes, the IBL throughputs of both the GU and the UAV are derived under the two schemes. More importantly, we also consider the scenario in which data packets are transmitted via finite blocklength (FBL) codes, i.e., data transmission to both the UAV and the GU is performed under low-latency and high reliability constraints. In this setting, the FBL throughputs are characterized again considering the two schemes of NOMA and relaying. Following the IBL and FBL throughput characterizations, optimal resource allocation designs are subsequently proposed to maximize the UAV throughput while guaranteeing the throughput of the cellular user. Moreover, we prove that the relaying scheme is able to provide transmission service to the UAV while improving the GU's performance, and that the relaying scheme potentially offers a higher throughput to the UAV in the FBL regime than in the IBL regime. On the other hand, the NOMA scheme provides a higher UAV throughput (than relaying) by slightly sacrificing the GU's performance.

[1]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: opportunities and challenges , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Yulin Hu,et al.  Closed-Form Symbol Error Rate Expressions for Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Systems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[4]  Sofie Pollin,et al.  Ultra Reliable UAV Communication Using Altitude and Cooperation Diversity , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[5]  Sofie Pollin,et al.  LTE in the sky: trading off propagation benefits with interference costs for aerial nodes , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Vincent Yan Fu Tan,et al.  The third-order term in the normal approximation for the AWGN channel , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[7]  Asgeir J. Sørensen,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicle as communication relay for autonomous underwater vehicle — Field tests , 2014, 2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[8]  Jianwei Huang,et al.  Monotonic Optimization in Communication and Networking Systems , 2013 .

[9]  Dong In Kim,et al.  UAV-Enabled Downlink Wireless System with Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access , 2017, 2017 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps).

[10]  Kandeepan Sithamparanathan,et al.  Optimal LAP Altitude for Maximum Coverage , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[11]  Ryu Miura,et al.  On A Novel Adaptive UAV-Mounted Cloudlet-Aided Recommendation System for LBSNs , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.

[12]  Xiaoming Chen,et al.  UAV-Aided NOMA Networks with Optimization of Trajectory and Precoding , 2018, 2018 10th International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP).

[13]  Sergey Andreev,et al.  Performance Evaluation of UAV-Assisted mmWave Operation in Mobility-Enabled Urban Deployments , 2018, 2018 41st International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP).

[14]  Chenyang Yang,et al.  Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Communication Systems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Dynamic User Clustering and Power Allocation for Uplink and Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA) Systems , 2016, IEEE Access.

[16]  Yulin Hu,et al.  Efficient transmission schemes for low-latency networks: NOMA vs. relaying , 2017, 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[17]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Drone-enabled bridge inspection methodology and application , 2018, Automation in Construction.

[18]  Chenyang Yang,et al.  Radio Resource Management for Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications , 2017, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[19]  Arumugam Nallanathan,et al.  Joint Blocklength and Location Optimization for URLLC-Enabled UAV Relay Systems , 2019, IEEE Communications Letters.

[20]  Ryu Miura,et al.  AC-POCA: Anticoordination Game Based Partially Overlapping Channels Assignment in Combined UAV and D2D-Based Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[21]  Chao Shen,et al.  Energy-Efficient Packet Scheduling With Finite Blocklength Codes: Convexity Analysis and Efficient Algorithms , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[22]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  3-D Placement of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Base Station for Maximum Coverage of Users With Different QoS Requirements , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[23]  Anass Benjebbour,et al.  System-level performance evaluation of downlink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[24]  Pingzhi Fan,et al.  Impact of User Pairing on 5G Nonorthogonal Multiple-Access Downlink Transmissions , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[25]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  A Resource Allocation Algorithm for Multivehicle Systems With Nonholonomic Constraints , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[26]  Sergey Andreev,et al.  Flexible and Reliable UAV-Assisted Backhaul Operation in 5G mmWave Cellular Networks , 2018, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[27]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Synthesis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Applications for Infrastructures , 2018, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities.

[28]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Throughput Maximization for UAV-Enabled Mobile Relaying Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[29]  James Gross,et al.  On the Capacity of Relaying With Finite Blocklength , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[30]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Channel Coding Rate in the Finite Blocklength Regime , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[31]  James Gross,et al.  On the outage probability and effective capacity of multiple decode-and-forward relay system , 2012, 2012 IFIP Wireless Days.