Deterministic Theorizing in Structural Learning: Three Levels of Empiricism.

[1]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[2]  Joseph M. Scandura,et al.  Precision in research on mathematics learning: The emerging field of psycho-mathematics , 1966 .

[3]  Joachim F. Wohlwill,et al.  The emerging discipline of environmental psychology. , 1970 .

[4]  Joseph M. Scandura,et al.  Role of rules in behavior: Toward an operational definition of what (rule) is learned. , 1970 .

[5]  G. Miller,et al.  Plans and the structure of behavior , 1960 .

[6]  K. Gödel.  Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I , 1931 .

[7]  Joseph M. Scandura,et al.  New directions for theory and research on rule learning , 1969 .

[8]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[9]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .

[10]  R. J. Nelson,et al.  Introduction to Automata , 1968 .

[11]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[12]  R. Gagne.  Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[13]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Some counting models for first-grade performance data on simple addition facts , 1966 .

[14]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Finitary models of language users , 1963 .

[15]  R. Gagne.  The acquisition of knowledge. , 1962 .

[16]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Stimulus-response theory of finite automata , 1969 .

[17]  J. Scandura.  A Theory of Mathematical Knowledge: Can Rules Account for Creative Behavior?. , 1971 .