Tree size frequency distributions, plant density, age and community disturbance

We show that explicit mathematical and biological relationships exist among the scaling exponents and the allometric constants (a and b, respectively) of log–log linear treecommunity size frequency distributions, plant density NT, and minimum, maximum and average stem diameters (Dmin, Dmax, and D, respectively). As individuals grow in size and Dmax increases, NT is predicted to decrease as reflected by a decrease in the numerical value of a and an increase in the value of b. Our derivations further show that NT decreases as D increases even if Dmin or Dmax remain unchanged. Because Dmax and the age of the largest individuals in a community are correlated, albeit weakly, we argue that the interdependent relationships among the numerical values of a, b, NT, and D shed light on the extent to which communities have experienced recent global disturbance. These predicted relationships receive strong statistical support using two large datasets spanning a broad spectrum of tree-dominated communities.

[1]  J. White,et al.  CORRELATED CHANGES IN PLANT SIZE AND NUMBER IN PLANT POPULATIONS , 1970 .

[2]  K. Yoda,et al.  Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI) , 1963 .

[3]  M. Bowler,et al.  Coexistence and relative abundance in forest trees , 2002, Nature.

[4]  O. T. Solbrig,et al.  Demographic factors in populations of plants. , 1980 .

[5]  N. Enright,et al.  A matrix population model analysis for the tropical tree, Araucaria cunninghamii , 1991 .

[6]  F. Gilliam,et al.  Patterns and Mechanisms of Plant Diversity in Forested Ecosystems: Implications for Forest Management , 1995 .

[7]  J. Chave.  Study of structural, successional and spatial patterns in tropical rain forests using TROLL, a spatially explicit forest model , 1999 .

[8]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Predicting Population Trends from Size Distributions: A Direct Test in a Tropical Tree Community , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[9]  W. Carson,et al.  Resource quantity, not resource heterogeneity, maintains plant diversity , 2002 .

[10]  P. J. Edwards,et al.  World Forest Biomass and Primary Production Data. , 1983 .

[11]  Kevin D. Janni.  Global Patterns of Plant Diversity: Alwyn H. Gentry’s Forest Transect Data Set , 2003 .

[12]  K. Gaston,et al.  Occupancy frequency distributions: patterns, artefacts and mechanisms , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[13]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities , 2001, Nature.

[14]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Investigations in commonness and rarity: a comparative analysis of co‐occurring, congeneric Mexican trees , 2001 .