Optimization of an ROC hypersurface constructed only from an observer's within-class sensitivities

We have shown in previous work that an ideal observer in a classification task with N classes achieves the optimal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) hypersurface in a Neyman-Pearson sense. That is, the hypersurface obtained by taking one of the ideal observer's misclassification probabilities as a function of the other N2-N-1 misclassification probabilities is never above the corresponding hypersurface obtained by any other observer. Due to the inherent complexity of evaluating observer performance in an N-class classification task with N>2, some researchers have suggested a generally incomplete but more tractable evaluation in terms of a hypersurface plotting only the N "sensitivities" (the probabilities of correctly classifying observations in the various classes). An N-class observer generally has up to N2-N-1 degrees of freedom, so a given sensitivity will still vary when the other N-1 are held fixed; a well-defined hypersurface can be constructed by considering only the maximum possible value of one sensitivity for each achievable value of the other N-1. We show that optimal performance in terms of this generally incomplete performance descriptor, in a Neyman-Pearson sense, is still achieved by the N-class ideal observer. That is, the hypersurface obtained by taking the maximal value of one of the ideal observer's correct classification probabilities as a function of the other N-1 is never below the corresponding hypersurface obtained by any other observer.

[1]  Xin He,et al.  Three-class ROC analysis-a decision theoretic approach under the ideal observer framework , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Scurfield,et al.  Generalization of the Theory of Signal Detectability to n-Event m-Dimensional Forced-Choice Tasks. , 1998, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[3]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  D. Mossman Three-way ROCs , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  S. I. Grossman Multivariable Calculus, Linear Algebra and Differential Equations , 1982 .

[6]  C. Metz,et al.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation. , 1999, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[7]  Charles E. Metz,et al.  Review of several proposed three-class classification decision rules and their relation to the ideal observer decision rule , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  The hypervolume under the ROC hypersurface of "Near-Guessing" and "Near-Perfect" observers in N-class classification tasks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Darrin C. Edwards,et al.  Estimating three-class ideal observer decision variables for computerized detection and classification of mammographic mass lesions. , 2003, Medical physics.

[10]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Design of three-class classifiers in computer-aided diagnosis: Monte Carlo simulation study , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Ideal observers and optimal ROC hypersurfaces in N-class classification , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Charles E. Metz,et al.  Restrictions on the three-class ideal observer's decision boundary lines , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  C. Metz,et al.  Analysis of proposed three-class classification decision rules in terms of the ideal observer decision rule , 2006 .