Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research

Extant literature has increased our understanding of the multifaceted nature of the digital divide, showing that it entails more than access to information and communication resources. Research indicates that digital inequality mirrors to a significant extent offline inequality related to socioeconomic resources. Bridging digital divides is critical for sustainable digitalized societies. Ιn this paper, we present a literature review of Information Systems research on the digital divide within settings with advanced technological infrastructures and economies over the last decade (2010–2020). The review results are organized in a concept matrix mapping contributing factors and measures for crossing the divides. Building on the results, we elaborate a research agenda that proposes [1] extending established models of digital inequalities with new variables and use of theory, [2] critically examining the effects of digital divide interventions, and [3] better linking digital divide research with research on sustainability. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10796-020-10096-3.

[1]  J. Yolton A Theory of Knowledge , 1924, Nature.

[2]  DAVID MILLER,et al.  Information and Communication , 1966, Nature.

[3]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[4]  Owen Adams Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide: A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America , 2000 .

[5]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[6]  David J. Gunkel Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide , 2003, New Media Soc..

[7]  Barbara Kitchenham,et al.  Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews , 2004 .

[8]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Digital Inequality: From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use , 2004 .

[9]  Karine Barzilai-Nahon,et al.  Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s , 2006 .

[10]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[11]  J. V. Dijk Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings , 2006 .

[12]  James B. Pick,et al.  A Global Model of Technological Utilization Based on Governmental, Business-Investment, Social, and Economic Factors , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  R. Briggs,et al.  Association for Information Systems , 2007 .

[14]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Complementarities in the Diffusion of Personal Computers and the Internet: Implications for the Global Digital Divide , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  The Age-Divide in Private Internet Usage: A Quantitative Study of Technology Acceptance , 2010, AMCIS.

[16]  Kallol Kumar Bagchi,et al.  Understanding the Internet Digital Divide: An Exploratory Multi-Nation Individual-Level Analysis , 2010, AMCIS.

[17]  Valrie Chambers,et al.  Approaching digital equity: is wifi the new leveler? , 2010, Inf. Technol. People.

[18]  Dinesh K. Gauri,et al.  Home Internet Access and Usage in the USA: Trends in the Socio-Economic Digital Divide , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Addressing Digital Inequality for the Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Through Government Initiatives: Forms of Capital That Affect ICT Utilization , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Janice C. Sipior,et al.  The digital divide and t-government in the United States: using the technology acceptance model to understand usage , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  She-I Chang,et al.  Study of the digital divide evaluation model for government agencies–a Taiwanese local government’s perspective , 2012, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[24]  Belal M. Abdelfattah Individual-Multinational Study of Internet Use: The Digital Divide Explained by Displacement Hypothesis and Knowledge-gap Hypothesis , 2012, AMCIS.

[25]  J. V. Dijk The Evolution of the Digital Divide - The Digital Divide Turns to Inequality of Skills and Usage , 2012 .

[26]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Public e-services for agency efficiency and citizen benefit - Findings from a stakeholder centered analysis , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Pradeep Racherla,et al.  Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  G. C. Pentzaropoulos,et al.  E-Inclusion Policies for Contemporary Knowledge Economies and Societies: An Examination of the Main Issues , 2014 .

[30]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Understanding e‐Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  Hepu Deng,et al.  A multidimensional and integrative approach to study global digital divide and e-government development , 2014, Inf. Technol. People.

[32]  Catherine A. Middleton,et al.  The Multi-layers of Digital Exclusion in Rural Australia , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[33]  Junzhao Ma,et al.  Does better Internet access lead to more adoption? A new empirical study using household relocation , 2015, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[34]  Khorshed Alam,et al.  The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: A case in regional Australia , 2015, Inf. Technol. People.

[35]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Theory of Knowledge for Literature Reviews: An Epistemological Model, Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of IS Literature , 2015, ICIS.

[36]  Rajiv George Aricat Is (the study of) mobile phones old wine in a new bottle? A polemic on communication-based acculturation research , 2015, Inf. Technol. People.

[37]  E. Helsper,et al.  The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? , 2015 .

[38]  Shirish C. Srivastava,et al.  Bridging the Service Divide Through Digitally Enabled Service Innovations: Evidence from Indian Healthcare Service Providers , 2015, MIS Q..

[39]  Everlin Piccinini,et al.  The Impact of Gamification-Induced Emotions on In-car IS Adoption -- The Difference between Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[40]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Information and Communication Technology and the Social Inclusion of Refugees , 2016, MIS Q..

[41]  Miria Grisot,et al.  Enabling Electronic Interactions between Patients and Healthcare Providers: a service design perspective , 2016, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[42]  James B. Pick,et al.  Theories of the Digital Divide: Critical Comparison , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[43]  Miria Grisot,et al.  Re-Infrastructuring for eHealth: Dealing with Turns in Infrastructure Development , 2017, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[44]  Eveline Hage,et al.  Towards Rethinking the Digital Divide - Recognizing Shades of Grey in Older Adults' Digital Inclusion , 2017, ICIS.

[45]  Ana Ortiz de Guinea,et al.  What literature review type should I conduct , 2017 .

[46]  Grace Fox,et al.  Mobile health technology adoption across generations: Narrowing the digital divide , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[47]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies , 2018, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[48]  Maximilian Haug,et al.  Equal Access for Everyone? A Digital Divide Cascade for retired Senior Citizens , 2018, ECIS.

[49]  R. V. Rikard,et al.  Digital Rehabilitation: A Model of Reentry Into the Digital Age , 2018 .

[50]  James B. Pick,et al.  Internet Use and Online Activities in U.S. States: Geographic Disparities and Socio-economic Influences , 2018, HICSS.

[51]  Margaret Meiling Luo,et al.  Internet Village Motoman Project in rural Cambodia: bridging the digital divide , 2018, Inf. Technol. People.

[52]  Lorenz Graf-Vlachy,et al.  Mechanisms of Engagement With, and Disengagement From, Internet Applications: A Qualitative Study of Online Job Search , 2018, ICIS.

[53]  Pedro Cano,et al.  Digital Information Access for Ageing Persons , 2018, 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).

[54]  Jie Xiong,et al.  How does family support work when older adults obtain information from mobile internet? , 2019, Inf. Technol. People.

[55]  Jesper Holgersson,et al.  Bridging the Gap - Exploring Elderly Citizens' Perceptions of Digital Exclusion , 2019, ECIS.

[56]  Julia Krönung,et al.  Specialized Information Systems for the Digitally Disadvantaged , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Gordon Burtch,et al.  Investigating the Relationship Between Medical Crowdfunding and Personal Bankruptcy in the United States: Evidence of A Digital Divide , 2015, MIS Q..

[58]  K. Onitsuka How Social Media Can Foster Social Innovation in Disadvantaged Rural Communities , 2019, Sustainability.

[59]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Big data and business analytics: A research agenda for realizing business value , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[60]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  The Digital Divide and Older Adult Population Adoption, Use and Diffusion of Mobile Phones: a Quantitative Study , 2018, Information Systems Frontiers.

[61]  Elisabeth Beaunoyer,et al.  COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies , 2020, Computers in Human Behavior.

[62]  Joseph G. Davis,et al.  Digital Exclusion and Divide in the United States: Exploratory Empirical Analysis of Contributing Factors , 2020, AMCIS.

[63]  Dag H. Olsen,et al.  Creating a sustainable digital infrastructure: The role of service-oriented architecture , 2020, CENTERIS/ProjMAN/HCist.

[64]  Angsana A. Techatassanasoontorn,et al.  Digital enforcement: Rethinking the pursuit of a digitally‐enabled society , 2020, Inf. Syst. J..

[65]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Assessing the Role of Age, Education, Gender and Income on the Digital Divide: Evidence for the European Union , 2020, Information Systems Frontiers.