Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs.

Four studies demonstrated both the power of group influence in persuasion and people's blindness to it. Even under conditions of effortful processing, attitudes toward a social policy depended almost exclusively upon the stated position of one's political party. This effect overwhelmed the impact of both the policy's objective content and participants' ideological beliefs (Studies 1-3), and it was driven by a shift in the assumed factual qualities of the policy and in its perceived moral connotations (Study 4). Nevertheless, participants denied having been influenced by their political group, although they believed that other individuals, especially their ideological adversaries, would be so influenced. The underappreciated role of social identity in persuasion is discussed.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[2]  Theodore M. Newcomb,et al.  Personality and social change , 1943 .

[3]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[4]  S. Asch,et al.  The doctrine of suggestion, prestige and imitation in social psychology. , 1948, Psychological review.

[5]  E. Katz.  The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis , 1957 .

[6]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator , 1966 .

[7]  A. Briggs,et al.  Personality and Social Change , 1967, Nature.

[8]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Psychological foundations of attitudes , 1968 .

[9]  T. Ostrom,et al.  9 – Psychological Perspective and Attitude Change1 , 1968 .

[10]  G. Ichheiser,et al.  Appearances and realities , 1970 .

[11]  J Cooper,et al.  Dissonance and the pill: an attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[13]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[14]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[15]  V. L. Allen,et al.  Impact of group consensus and social support on stimulus meaning: Mediation of conformity by cognitive restructuring. , 1980 .

[16]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[17]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[18]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach , 1982 .

[19]  W. Davison.  The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[20]  P. J. Conover,et al.  Group Identification, Values, and the Nature of Political Beliefs , 1984 .

[21]  L. Ross,et al.  The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Attitude Attribution: A Group Basis for Political Reasoning , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[23]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[25]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[26]  C. F. Kao,et al.  Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. , 1986 .

[27]  Philip E. Tetlock,et al.  A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning , 1986 .

[28]  C. Steele.  The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self , 1988 .

[29]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[30]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta-analysis , 1989 .

[31]  Leila T. Worth,et al.  Processing of persuasive in-group messages. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  D. O. Sears,et al.  The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes , 1991 .

[33]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[34]  L. S. Ross,et al.  The person and the situation , 1991 .

[35]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Knowledge of the Advocated Position and the Processing of In-Group and Out-Group Persuasive Messages , 1992 .

[37]  R. Buehler,et al.  Role of construal processes in conformity and dissent. , 1993 .

[38]  M. Zanna,et al.  The Rhetorical Use of Values to Justify Social and Intergroup Attitudes , 1994 .

[39]  Samuel R. Gross,et al.  Hardening of the Attitudes: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty , 1994 .

[40]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Mental contamination and mental correction: unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  A. Elliot,et al.  On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. , 1994 .

[43]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  L. Ross,et al.  Actual versus assumed differences in construal: 'naive realism' in intergroup perception and conflict , 1995 .

[45]  W. Wood,et al.  Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: the normative impact of majority and minority groups. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  W. Crano,et al.  Cognitive responses to minority‐ or majority‐based communications: Factors that underlie minority influence , 1996 .

[47]  Edward S. Reed,et al.  Values and Knowledge , 1987, A Centre of Excellence.

[48]  Randall S. Peterson,et al.  Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. , 1996 .

[49]  Robert J. Robinson,et al.  Extremism, Power, and the Imagined Basis of Social Conflict , 1996 .

[50]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. , 1998 .

[52]  D. Armor.  The illusion of objectivity: A bias in the perception of freedom from bias. , 1999 .

[53]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Motivated Heuristic and Systematic Processing , 1999 .

[54]  B. Malle,et al.  How People Explain Behavior: A New Theoretical Framework , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[55]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[56]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Attitude Representation Theory , 1999 .

[57]  P. Heaven.  Group Identities and Human Values , 1999 .

[58]  Dan M. Kahan,et al.  The Secret Ambition of Deterrence , 1999, Deterrence.

[59]  B. Bettencourt,et al.  The cognitive contents of social-group identity: values, emotions, and relationships , 1999 .

[60]  N. Epley,et al.  Feeling "holier than thou": are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  M. Hogg,et al.  Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership in social influence processes , 2000 .

[62]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  When Beliefs Yield to Evidence: Reducing Biased Evaluation by Affirming the Self , 2000 .

[63]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Identity and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach. , 2000 .

[64]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Evidence for referential understanding in the emotions domain at twelve and eighteen months. , 2001, Child development.

[65]  J. Haidt.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.

[66]  Attributional biases about the origins of attitudes: externality, emotionality, and rationality. , 2002 .

[67]  L. Ross,et al.  The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others , 2002 .

[68]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  Thomas D. Griffin,et al.  Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[70]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Accepting Threatening Information: Self–Affirmation and the Reduction of Defensive Biases , 2002 .