Network Position, Absorptive Capacity and Firm Success

Interaction between firms or institutions in a regionally bounded area leads to a substructure conductive for innovative activities. In a vital Regional Innovation System (RIS) the actors benefit from a multilayer network consisting of business relations, innovative cooperations and daily personal contacts by which they get access to external innovative impulses. We ask in this paper whether these knowledge flows and the way firms attempt to manage them have a positive influence on the firm’s success. Our analysis is based on data from an industrial sub-region of Jena, Jena-Goeschwitz. We find that Knowledge Management (KM) is positively related to a firm’s central network position. This central position in turn plays a significant role with respect to expected economic success and innovative performance. Moreover, what is decisive for that is the firms’ propensity to engage in research cooperation with suppliers in the region, with national public research and foreign customers respectively. Especially, the last finding illustrates the necessity of so-called global pipelines for firms located in a regional innovation system.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[3]  Elisa Giuliani,et al.  The structure of cluster knowledge networks: uneven and selective, not pervasive and collective , 2005 .

[4]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Prospects for Developing Absorptive Capacity Through Internal Information Provision , 2004 .

[5]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[6]  David E. Stout,et al.  Dynamics of Industrial Clustering: International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology , 1998 .

[7]  M. Bell,et al.  The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster , 2005 .

[8]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers And Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey , 2001 .

[9]  P. Krugman Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[10]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[11]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Formal and Informal Cooperation Strategies in International Industrial Networks , 1988 .

[12]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[14]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[15]  Ha Henny Romijn,et al.  What drives innovativeness in industrial clusters? Transcending the debate , 2005 .

[16]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy , 2007 .

[17]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[19]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle , 1995 .

[20]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[21]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[22]  John A. Mathews,et al.  Competitive dynamics and economic learning: an extended resource-based view , 2003 .

[23]  M. Zeegers,et al.  Gatekeepers of knowledge , 2010 .

[24]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[25]  E. Hippel Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .

[26]  Tobias Schmidt,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: One Size Fits All? Firm-level Analysis of Absorptive Capacity for Different Kinds of Knowledge , 2005 .

[27]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Patent Citations , 1998 .

[28]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[29]  U. Cantner,et al.  Determinants influencing the choice of a cooperation partner , 2006 .

[30]  Rod Coombs,et al.  `Knowledge management practices' and path-dependency in innovation , 1998 .

[31]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[32]  Roberta Rabellotti,et al.  KNOWLEDGE DISSEMINATION AND INFORMAL CONTACTS IN AN ITALIAN WINE LOCAL SYSTEM , 2005 .

[33]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[34]  Andrea Morrison,et al.  Gatekeepers of Knowledge within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How They Interact , 2008 .

[35]  Jie Yang,et al.  Knowledge integration and innovation: Securing new product advantage in high technology industry , 2005 .

[36]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation , 2004 .