A non-invasive system for epidural space detection: comparison with Compuflo®

Epidural blockade is a method often used in clinical practice to obtain pain relief during labor. Basically, the epidural puncture blocks the nerve impulses from the lower spinal segments with a consequent decrease of sensation in the lower half of the body. In this arena, the correct localization of the epidural space is crucial to perform the procedure. The loss of resistance (LOR) technique is the most popular approach to localize the epidural space. The LOR is caused by the fact that the ligamentum flavum is much harder than the epidural space, therefore when the needle tip pierces this ligamentum, there is an abrupt decrease of pressure (known as LOR). Although, there are several commercially available tools to support the clinicians in this task, the large part of epidural punctures is performed without any support. Our group of research has developed a novel and noninvasive tool to detect the LOR during epidural puncture. The aim of this study is to compare the output collected by the proposed system (i.e., the Epidural Space Management Tool, ESMT) with the output provided by a commercial system (i.e., CompuFlo®, Milestone Scientific, Inc.). Experiments were performed by an expert anesthesiologist (M.C.) on a simple simulator that allows mimicking the real scenario. Results showed a good agreement between the trends of the output of the two mentioned systems. Finally, the proposed system (ESMT), showed promising results in terms of LOR detection during all the five procedures performed on the simulator.

[1]  Emiliano Schena,et al.  A New Pressure Guided Management Tool for Epidural Space Detection: Feasibility Assessment on a Simulator , 2017, Artificial organs.

[2]  Emiliano Schena,et al.  Experimental analysis of the influencing factors on the response of a tool for epidural space detection , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA).

[3]  Angelo G Rocco Identification of the Epidural Space Using Pressure Measurement With the Compuflo Injection Pump-A Pilot Study , 2008, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[4]  S. Halpern,et al.  Local and Regional Anesthesia Dovepress Epidural Analgesia for Labor: Current Techniques , 2022 .

[5]  G. Mead,et al.  Is cost effective , 1995, BMJ.

[6]  Robert Greif,et al.  Loss of Resistance: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing 4 Low-fidelity Epidural Puncture Simulators , 2018, Obstetric Anesthesia Digest.

[7]  Francesca Cordella,et al.  Evaluation of Pressure Capacitive Sensors for Application in Grasping and Manipulation Analysis , 2017, Sensors.

[8]  Massimiliano Carassiti,et al.  Use Your EYES , 2016, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

[9]  G Capogna,et al.  Experimental validation of the CompuFlo® epidural controlled system to identify the epidural space and its clinical use in difficult obstetric cases. , 2018, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[10]  A. M. Dogliotti,et al.  Segmental peridural spinal anesthesia , 1933 .

[11]  D. Bugada,et al.  Regional anesthesia and anticoagulant drugs: A survey of current Italian practice , 2011 .

[12]  Edward Johnson Joseph,et al.  Comparative study of Episure™ AutoDetect™ syringe versus glass syringe for identification of epidural space in lower thoracic epidural , 2015, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[13]  Sergio Silvestri,et al.  Design and characterization of a measurement system for monitoring pressure exerted by bronchial blockers: In vitro trials , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[14]  Emiliano Schena,et al.  A cost-effective, non-invasive system for pressure monitoring during epidural needle insertion: Design, development and bench tests , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[15]  A. Habib,et al.  A Pilot Study to Compare the Episure™ Autodetect™ Syringe with the Glass Syringe for Identification of the Epidural Space in Parturients , 2008, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  Emiliano Schena,et al.  Ex vivo animal-model assessment of a non-invasive system for loss of resistance detection during epidural blockade , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[17]  Cynthia A. Wong,et al.  Maternal Body Mass Index and Use of Labor Neuraxial Analgesia: A Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study , 2018, Anesthesiology.

[18]  T. Lechner,et al.  Clinical results with a new acoustic device to identify the epidural space , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[19]  E Schena,et al.  Bronchial blockers under pressure: in vitro model and ex vivo model. , 2016, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  Carin A. Hagberg,et al.  The CompuFlo® helps unexperienced operators identify the epidural space in a simulator model: A‐941 , 2006 .