Sequential Score Adaptation with Extreme Value Theory for Robust Railway Track Inspection

Periodic inspections are necessary to keep railroad tracks in state of good repair and prevent train accidents. Automatic track inspection using machine vision technology has become a very effective inspection tool. Because of its non-contact nature, this technology can be deployed on virtually any railway vehicle to continuously survey the tracks and send exception reports to track maintenance personnel. However, as appearance and imaging conditions vary, false alarm rates can dramatically change, making it difficult to select a good operating point. In this paper, we use extreme value theory (EVT) within a Bayesian framework to optimally adjust the sensitivity of anomaly detectors. We show that by approximating the lower tail of the probability density function (PDF) of the scores with an Exponential distribution (a special case of the Generalized Pareto distribution), and using the Gamma conjugate prior learned from the training data, it is possible to reduce the variability in false alarm rate and improve the overall performance. This method has shown an increase in the defect detection rate of rail fasteners in the presence of clutter (at PFA 0.1%) from 95.40% to 99.26% on the 85-mile Northeast Corridor (NEC) 2012-2013 concrete tie dataset.

[1]  Anderson Rocha,et al.  Robust Fusion: Extreme Value Theory for Recognition Score Normalization , 2010, ECCV.

[2]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Robust computer vision: a least median of squares based approach , 1989 .

[3]  M PatelVishal,et al.  Deep Multitask Learning for Railway Track Inspection , 2017 .

[4]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Robust Fastener Detection for Autonomous Visual Railway Track Inspection , 2015, 2015 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision.

[5]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Adaptive Threshold Estimation via Extreme Value Theory , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[6]  Anderson Rocha,et al.  Meta-Recognition: The Theory and Practice of Recognition Score Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Frederick R. Forst,et al.  On robust estimation of the location parameter , 1980 .

[8]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Kendall's advanced theory of statistics. Volume 2A: classical inference and the linear model. Alan Stuart, Keith Ord and Steven Arnold, Arnold, London, 1998, No. of pages: xiv+885. Price: £85.00. ISBN 0‐340‐66230‐1 , 2000 .

[9]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[10]  H. Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[11]  Seokhoon Yun,et al.  The extremal index of a higher-order stationary Markov chain , 1998 .

[12]  J. Pickands Statistical Inference Using Extreme Order Statistics , 1975 .

[13]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Statistics of Extremes , 2015, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.