Graph Theoretic Analysis of Multilayer EEG Connectivity Networks

Over the past twenty years, functional connectivity of the human brain has been studied in detail using tools from complex network theory. These methods include graph theoretic metrics ranging from the micro-scale such as the degree of a node to the macro-scale such as the small worldness of the brain network. However, most of these network models focus on average activity within a time window of interest and given frequency band. Therefore, they cannot capture the changes in network connectivity across time and different frequency bands. Recently, multilayer brain networks have attracted a lot of attention as they can capture the full view of neuronal connectivity. In this paper, we introduce a multilayer view of the functional connectivity network of the brain, where each layer corresponds to a different frequency band. We construct multi-frequency connectivity networks from electroencephalogram data where the intra-layer edges are quantified by phase synchrony while the inter-layer edges are quantified by phase-amplitude coupling. We then introduce multilayer degree, participation coefficient and clustering coefficient to quantify the centrality of nodes across frequency layers and to identify the importance of different frequency bands. The proposed framework is applied to electroencephalogram data collected during a study of error monitoring in the human brain.

[1]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  A critical note on the definition of phase–amplitude cross-frequency coupling , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Prelude to and Resolution of an Error: EEG Phase Synchrony Reveals Cognitive Control Dynamics during Action Monitoring , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Graph theory methods: applications in brain networks , 2018, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[4]  Selin Aviyente,et al.  A phase synchrony measure for quantifying dynamic functional integration in the brain , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Z. Wang,et al.  The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks , 2014, Physics Reports.

[6]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Frequency-based brain networks: From a multiplex framework to a full multilayer description , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[7]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Gamma (40-100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  Lena S. Geiger,et al.  Dynamic brain network reconfiguration as a potential schizophrenia genetic risk mechanism modulated by NMDA receptor function , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Integrating cross-frequency and within band functional networks in resting-state MEG: A multi-layer network approach , 2016, NeuroImage.

[10]  Mikko Kivelä,et al.  Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Ali Yener Mutlu,et al.  A Time-Frequency-Based Approach to Phase and Phase Synchrony Estimation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  P Van Mieghem,et al.  Interconnectivity structure of a general interdependent network. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[13]  B. Rasch,et al.  Quantification of Phase-Amplitude Coupling in Neuronal Oscillations: Comparison of Phase-Locking Value, Mean Vector Length, Modulation Index, and Generalized-Linear-Modeling-Cross-Frequency-Coupling , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[14]  Vito Latora,et al.  Structural measures for multiplex networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Selin Aviyente,et al.  Time-Frequency Based Phase-Amplitude Coupling Measure For Neuronal Oscillations , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[16]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  A multi-layer network approach to MEG connectivity analysis , 2016, NeuroImage.

[17]  C. Tenke,et al.  Generator localization by current source density (CSD): Implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Selin Aviyente,et al.  Comparison of Wavelet and RID-Rihaczek Based Methods for Phase-Amplitude Coupling , 2019, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[19]  Tim P. Moran,et al.  Sex moderates the relationship between worry and performance monitoring brain activity in undergraduates. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Multilayer networks , 2013, J. Complex Networks.

[21]  August W. Rihaczek,et al.  Signal energy distribution in time and frequency , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[22]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Dynamic Interactions between Large-Scale Brain Networks Predict Behavioral Adaptation after Perceptual Errors , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Alex Arenas,et al.  Mapping Multiplex Hubs in Human Functional Brain Networks , 2016, Front. Neurosci..