Digital Elevation Models: Terminology and Definitions

Digital elevation models (DEMs) provide fundamental depictions of the three-dimensional shape of the Earth’s surface and are useful to a wide range of disciplines. Ideally, DEMs record the interface between the atmosphere and the lithosphere using a discrete two-dimensional grid, with complexities introduced by the intervening hydrosphere, cryosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The treatment of DEM surfaces, affected by these intervening spheres, depends on their intended use, and the characteristics of the sensors that were used to create them. DEM is a general term, and more specific terms such as digital surface model (DSM) or digital terrain model (DTM) record the treatment of the intermediate surfaces. Several global DEMs generated with optical (visible and near-infrared) sensors and synthetic aperture radar (SAR), as well as single/multi-beam sonars and products of satellite altimetry, share the common characteristic of a georectified, gridded storage structure. Nevertheless, not all DEMs share the same vertical datum, not all use the same convention for the area on the ground represented by each pixel in the DEM, and some of them have variable data spacings depending on the latitude. This paper highlights the importance of knowing, understanding and reflecting on the sensor and DEM characteristics and consolidates terminology and definitions of key concepts to facilitate a common understanding among the growing community of DEM users, who do not necessarily share the same background.

[1]  D. Fabre,et al.  Global Bathymetry and Elevation Data at 30 Arc Seconds Resolution: SRTM30_PLUS , 2009 .

[2]  Laurent Polidori,et al.  Digital Elevation Model Quality Assessment Methods: A Critical Review , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[3]  Hiroji Tsu,et al.  The ASTER Global DEM , 2010 .

[4]  W. P. Segu Terrain approximation by fixed grid polynomial , 2006 .

[5]  S- and R-approximations of the Earth's surface topography , 2012 .

[6]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Optimisation of global grids for high-resolution remote sensing data , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  A. Jon Kimerling,et al.  A comparison of intercell metrics on discrete global grid systems , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[8]  Benjamin Stular,et al.  Airborne LiDAR-Derived Digital Elevation Model for Archaeology , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Ali Mahdavi-Amiri,et al.  Hexagonal connectivity maps for Digital Earth , 2015, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[10]  Igor V. Florinsky,et al.  An illustrated introduction to general geomorphometry , 2017 .

[11]  Kateřina Gdulová,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the global TanDEM-X digital elevation model in a mountain environment , 2020 .

[12]  Waldo R. Tobler,et al.  Geographical Filters and their Inverses , 2010 .

[13]  Michael Höhle,et al.  Accuracy assessment of digital elevation models by means of robust statistical methods , 2009 .

[14]  D. Mark Computer Analysis of Topography: A Comparison of Terrain Storage Methods , 1975 .

[15]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  Generation and performance assessment of the global TanDEM-X digital elevation model , 2017 .

[16]  Francisco Javier Ariza-López,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Elevation Models (DEMs): A Critical Review of Practices of the Past Three Decades , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[17]  Laurence Hawker,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the TanDEM-X 90 Digital Elevation Model for selected floodplain sites , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[18]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models , 2006 .

[19]  Michael Abrams,et al.  ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) and ASTER Global Water Body Dataset (ASTWBD) , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[20]  E. Johnson,et al.  Biogeosciences survey , 2012 .

[21]  D. Gesch,et al.  Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010) , 2011 .