Investigation of Nozzle Flow and Cavitation Characteristics in a Diesel Injector

Cavitation and turbulence inside a diesel injector play a critical role in primary spray breakup and development processes. The study of cavitation in realistic injectors is challenging, both theoretically and experimentally, since the associated two-phase flow field is turbulent and highly complex, characterized by large pressure gradients and small orifice geometries. We report herein a computational investigation of the internal nozzle flow and cavitation characteristics in a diesel injector. A mixture based model in FLUENT V6.2 software is employed for simulations. In addition, a new criterion for cavitation inception based on the total stress is implemented, and its effectiveness in predicting cavitation is evaluated. Results indicate that under realistic diesel engine conditions, cavitation patterns inside the orifice are influenced by the new cavitation criterion. Simulations are validated using the available two-phase nozzle flow data and the rate of injection measurements at various injection pressures (800-1600 bar) from the present study. The computational model is then used to characterize the effects of important injector parameters on the internal nozzle flow and cavitation behavior, as well as on flow properties at the nozzle exit. The parameters include injection pressure, needle lift position, and fuel type. The propensity of cavitation for different on-fleetmore » diesel fuels is compared with that for n-dodecane, a diesel fuel surrogate. Results indicate that the cavitation characteristics of n-dodecane are significantly different from those of the other three fuels investigated. The effect of needle movement on cavitation is investigated by performing simulations at different needle lift positions. Cavitation patterns are seen to shift dramatically as the needle lift position is changed during an injection event. The region of significant cavitation shifts from top of the orifice to bottom of the orifice as the needle position is changed from fully open (0.275 mm) to nearly closed (0.1 mm), and this behavior can be attributed to the effect of needle position on flow patterns upstream of the orifice. The results demonstrate the capability of the cavitation model to predict cavitating nozzle flows in realistic diesel injectors and provide boundary conditions, in terms of vapor fraction, velocity, and turbulence parameters at the nozzle exit, which can be coupled with the primary breakup simulation.« less

[1]  Raul Payri,et al.  A Numerical Study of the Influence of Diesel Nozzle Geometry on the Inner Cavitating Flow , 2002 .

[2]  C. Arcoumanis,et al.  Cavitation Modelling in Single-Hole Diesel Injector Based on Eulerian-Lagrangian Approach , 2004 .

[3]  R. Reitz,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Injector Nozzle Geometry on Diesel Sprays , 1999 .

[4]  Alfred Leipertz,et al.  Investigation of cavitation in real size diesel injection nozzles , 1999 .

[5]  Daniel D. Joseph,et al.  Cavitation and the state of stress in a flowing liquid , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Manolis Gavaises,et al.  Modelling of sprays from high-pressure swirl atomizers , 2001 .

[7]  Daniel D. Joseph,et al.  Cavitation in an orifice flow , 2007 .

[8]  J. Naber,et al.  Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays , 1996 .

[9]  Celia Soteriou,et al.  Diesel injection : laser light sheet illumination of the development of cavitation in orifices , 1998 .

[10]  Marco Badami,et al.  Cavitation in real-size, multi-hole diesel injector nozzles , 2000 .

[11]  Wilhelm Bosch,et al.  The Fuel Rate Indicator: A New Measuring Instrument For Display of the Characteristics of Individual Injection , 1966 .

[12]  M. Gavaises,et al.  Effect of Multi-Injection Strategy on Cavitation Development in Diesel Injector Nozzle Holes , 2005 .

[13]  M. Dirke,et al.  Simulation of Cavitating Flows in Diesel Injectors , 1999 .

[14]  Ming Chia Lai,et al.  Modeling Dynamic Behavior of Diesel Fuel Injection Systems , 2004 .

[15]  R. Reitz,et al.  A Numerical Investigation of Nozzle Geometry and Injection Condition Effects on Diesel Fuel Injector Flow Physics , 2008 .

[16]  Ming Chia Lai,et al.  Investigation of Diesel Spray Primary Break-up and Development for Different Nozzle Geometries , 2002 .

[17]  Christopher J. Rutland,et al.  Cavitation in Two-Dimensional Asymmetric Nozzles , 1999 .

[18]  Ming Li,et al.  Simulating Diesel Injectors Based on Different Cavitation Modeling Approaches , 2005 .

[19]  A. K. Singhal,et al.  Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model , 2002 .

[20]  S. Bair,et al.  Cavitation in creeping shear flows , 2005 .

[21]  A. Kastengren,et al.  Spray density measurements using X-ray radiography , 2007 .

[22]  Raul Payri,et al.  Analysis of the Influence of Diesel Nozzle Geometry in the Injection Rate Characteristic , 2004 .

[23]  Ornella Chiavola,et al.  Coupling Codes for Nozzle Flow Modelling in Diesel Injection System , 2006 .

[24]  G. Wallis One Dimensional Two-Phase Flow , 1969 .

[25]  Peter J. O'Rourke,et al.  The TAB method for numerical calculation of spray droplet breakup , 1987 .

[26]  Uwe Iben,et al.  Modeling of Cavitation , 2002 .

[27]  M. Jog,et al.  Nonlinear Breakup Model for a Liquid Sheet Emanating From a Pressure-Swirl Atomizer , 2007 .

[28]  W. Sirignano,et al.  Stress-induced cavitation for the streaming motion of a viscous liquid past a sphere , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  F. Obermeier,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF CAVITATION IN THE NOZZLE HOLE OF DIESEL INJECTORS USING TRANSPARENT NOZZLES , 1995 .

[30]  Stephen D. Heister,et al.  Two-phase modeling of cavitated flows , 1995 .

[31]  Raul Payri,et al.  The influence of cavitation on the internal flow and the spray characteristics in diesel injection nozzles , 2004 .

[32]  Ming Jia,et al.  A Micro-Variable Circular Orifice Fuel Injector for HCCI-Conventional Engine Combustion - Part I Numerical Simulation of Cavitation , 2007 .