Performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications.

We measured the physical imaging performance of a 41 x 41 cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel detector designed for angiographic and R&F imaging applications using methods from the emerging IEC standard for the measurement of detective quantum efficiency (DQE) in digital radiographic detectors. Measurements on 12 production detectors demonstrate consistent performance. The mean DQE at the detector center is about 0.77 at zero frequency and 0.27 at the Nyquist frequency (2.5 cycles/mm) when measured with a 7 mm of Al HVL spectrum at about 3.6 microGy. The mean MTF at the center of the detector for this spectrum is 0.24 at the Nyquist frequency. For radiographic operation all 2048 x 2048 detector elements are read out individually. For fluoroscopy, the detector operates in two 30 frame per second modes: either the center 1024 x 1024 detector elements are read out or the entire detector is read out with 2 x 2 pixel binning. A model was developed to predict differences in performance between the modes, and measurements demonstrate agreement with the model. Lag was measured using a quasi-equilibrium exposure method and was found to be 0.044 in the first frame and less than 0.007 after 1 s. We demonstrated that it is possible to use the lag data to correct for temporal correlation in images when measuring DQE with a fluoroscopic imaging technique. Measurements as a function of position on the detector demonstrate a high degree of uniformity. We also characterized dependences on spectrum, exposure level, and direction. Finally, we measured the DQE of a current state of the art image intensifier/CCD system using the same method as for the flat panel. We found the image intensifier system to have lower DQE than the flat panel at high exposure levels and approximately equivalent DQE at fluoroscopic levels.

[1]  Tatsuya Yamazaki,et al.  Novel large-area MIS-type x-ray image sensor for digital radiography , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Paul R. Granfors Performance characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel x-ray imaging detector , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[3]  D. Jaffray,et al.  A framework for noise-power spectrum analysis of multidimensional images. , 2002, Medical physics.

[4]  Brian G. Rodricks,et al.  Improved imaging performance of a 14"x17" direct radiography system using a Se/TFT detector , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Yu Cheng,et al.  Measurement of the noise power spectrum in digital x-ray detectors , 2001 .

[6]  Walter Dr. Hillen,et al.  Signal-to-noise performance in cesium iodide x-ray fluorescent screens , 1991, Medical Imaging.

[7]  G. Lubberts,et al.  Random Noise Produced by X-Ray Fluorescent Screens* , 1968 .

[8]  Ian A. Cunningham Linear-systems modeling of parallel cascaded stochastic processes: the NPS of radiographic screens with reabsorption of characteristic x-radiation , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[9]  Falko Busse,et al.  Design and performance of a high-quality cardiac flat detector , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Zhenxue Jing,et al.  Characterization of a full-field digital mammography detector based on direct x-ray conversion in selenium , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[12]  Douglas Albagli,et al.  Performance of a flat-panel cardiac detector , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[14]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Effect of depth-dependent modulation transfer function and K-fluorescence reabsorption on the detective quantum efficiency of indirect-conversion flat-panel x-ray imaging systems using CsI , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Thierry Ducourant,et al.  New CsI/a-Si 17" x 17" x-ray flat-panel detector provides superior detectivity and immediate direct digital output for general radiography systems , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[16]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  J. Gray,et al.  Fluoroscopic imaging: quantitation of image lag or smearing. , 1984, Radiology.

[18]  Richard Aufrichtig,et al.  DQE(f) of an amorphous-silicon flat-panel x-ray detector: detector parameter influences and measurement methodology , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[19]  K Stierstorfer,et al.  Self-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of x-ray detectors. , 1999, Medical physics.

[20]  Douglas Albagli,et al.  Modeling the x-ray energy characteristics of DQE for full-field digital mammography , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[21]  Robert G. Gould,et al.  Specification, acceptance testing and quality control of diagnostic x-ray imaging equipment , 1994 .