Studies of the relationship between luminance and pupil diameter have produced widely differing results. This research note explores the possibility that this is due, in part, to differences in the size of the adapting fields used by various workers. We present measurements of pupil diameter as a function of luminance for a variety of field subtenses. The results indicate a consistent trend for smaller subtenses to produce less pupil constriction. For field diameters of up to 25 degrees, replotting the data in terms of corneal flux density (i.e. the product of luminance and subtended area) causes an approximate convergence onto a single function described by D = 7.75-5.75 [(F/846)0.41/((F/846)0.41 / 2)] where D is the pupil diameter (mm) and F is the corneal flux density (cdm-2 deg2). This equation should be of some practical use in estimation of natural pupil diameter.
[1]
M Alpern,et al.
Effect of photoexcitation of the two retinas on pupil size.
,
1967,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[2]
J W GEBHARD,et al.
Pupil size as determined by adapting luminance.
,
1952,
Journal of the Optical Society of America.
[3]
R. Hunt,et al.
A model of colour vision for predicting colour appearance in various viewing conditions
,
1987
.
[4]
F. Campbell,et al.
Optical quality of the human eye
,
1966,
The Journal of physiology.
[5]
Don L. Jewett,et al.
Spectral Determinants of Steady-State Pupil Size with Full Field of View
,
1992
.
[6]
K H Spring,et al.
VARIATION OF PUPIL SIZE WITH CHANGE IN THE ANGLE AT WHICH THE LIGHT STIMULUS STRIKES THE RETINA*
,
1948,
The British journal of ophthalmology.